a quote

[stupidsucker]

[ QUOTE ]
_________________________
What is a good ROI for SnGs

You need to play at least 200-300 at a given level to get a good read.

25% ok
25% - 35% good
35% - 40% very good
40% - 45% excellent
45% - 50% probably unsustainable
50%+ one of: unsustainable, your lying, you have hacked the poker room

_______________________________________________

[/ QUOTE ]

If you know the origin please do not reveal your genius in this post.

[tigerite]

Easy..

[MegaBet]

Definitely NOT stanzee, simply because he would never say this:

45% - 50% probably unsustainable

[img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]

[splashpot]

Can't believe people think Irie would say this.

[mlagoo]

[ QUOTE ]
Can't believe people think Irie would say this.

[/ QUOTE ]

i voted irie only because i figure that's why the quote would be remarkable.

i mean, if stanzee said this, who cares?

[stupidsucker]

edit: removed my own comment that was missleading...

[microbet]

1. Irony - the voice for the long run is really long
2. The joke answer (one in every multiple choice question)
3. Self-effacing
4. Don't really know how to classify this answer
5. Few people will recognize the name, hasn't posted in a long time.

[microbet]

Post deleted by microbet

[stupidsucker]

edit: thanks bro

[The Yugoslavian]

The user in question posted that a *loooong* time ago. Although it is very interesting *where* it was posted.

Remember though, the boards best posters honestly felt at that time that these numbers were correct (and they may have been) as STTs were a very new poker structure online and even very good 2p2ers had only begun to scratch the surface of unexploitable play.

Yugoslav