thank you, price 'gougers'

[tylerdurden]

[ QUOTE ]
explain how this ownership is not different given that an outsider can forcably take control of one, but cannot take control of the other.

[/ QUOTE ]

So in your mind ability to direct force is more important than actual investment in a particular piece of property when determining ownership of that property? A right doesn't exist because it's *capable* of being violated?

Of course rights can be violated; if they couldn't, there wouldn't be much to debate.