Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Tournament Poker > One-table Tournaments
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 03-27-2005, 01:00 PM
Prickly Pete Prickly Pete is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: VA
Posts: 670
Default Re: Daliman throws his hat in with the conspiracy theorists.

[ QUOTE ]
***** Hand History for Game xxxxxxxxx*****
300/600 TourneyTexasHTGameTable (NL) (Tournament xxxxxxxx) - Sat Mar 26 02:12:15 EST 2005
Table Step 5 983423 (Real Money) -- Seat 6 is the button
Total number of players : 5
Seat 1: Some Guy (2315)
Seat 2: ZeeJustin (3085)
Seat 3: ZeJustin (2640)
Seat 4: ZJustin (850)
Seat 6: surrealpoker (1110)
Some guy posts small blind (150)
ZeJustin posts big blind (300)
** Dealing down cards **
Dealt to surrealpoker [ Ad, 6s ]
Player 3folds.
PacmanFL: 44% in the $1000's pretty damn impressive too
ZJustin raises (850) to 850
Zjustin 1 is all-In.
surrealpoker folds.
Some guy folds.
ZeeJustin folds.
Creating Main Pot with $1300 with ZJustin
** Summary **
Main Pot: 1300
Some guy balance 2165, lost 150 (folded)
ZeeJustin balance 2785, lost 300 (folded)
ZeJustin balance 2640, didn't bet (folded)
ZJustin balance 1300, bet 850, collected 1300, net +450
surrealpoker balance 1110, didn't bet (folded)

[/ QUOTE ]

Looks like wild speculation to me.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 03-27-2005, 01:24 PM
john_ john_ is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 142
Default Re: Daliman throws his hat in with the conspiracy theorists.

I think you're allowing your probable short-term bad luck at step 5 tournaments to affect your judgement. You can't expect the same ITM you have at 100's & 200's over such a small sample size at Step 5's. I think because you busted out on the bubble again you're moving to the conspiracy theory ring.

Loose calling early and loose calling all in's on the bubble are two completely different things.

They don't seem like completely horrible players either. Someone around 30% ITM which I would consider average you call horrible?

For what it's worth, a lot of people misplay hands on their blinds. Here's a couple of the worse cases I've seen at the higher stakes:

$200 NL STT - I get disconnected when I finally get back I'm in the money but on the button with 550 in chips Q3o. SB has about 1500 and BB has about 7950. I push all in into 250 / 500 blinds. BB folds to me! So I come back, outlast the SB & almost won.

Step 5 $1000 NL - I'm UTG with KK and 850 chips. I push all in into 25 / 50 blinds BB has about 2000 chips and calls with 73o and wins with straight.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 03-27-2005, 01:57 PM
Daliman Daliman is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 382
Default Re: Daliman throws his hat in with the conspiracy theorists.

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
***** Hand History for Game xxxxxxxxx*****
300/600 TourneyTexasHTGameTable (NL) (Tournament xxxxxxxx) - Sat Mar 26 02:12:15 EST 2005
Table Step 5 983423 (Real Money) -- Seat 6 is the button
Total number of players : 5
Seat 1: Some Guy (2315)
Seat 2: ZeeJustin (3085)
Seat 3: ZeJustin (2640)
Seat 4: ZJustin (850)
Seat 6: surrealpoker (1110)
Some guy posts small blind (150)
ZeJustin posts big blind (300)
** Dealing down cards **
Dealt to surrealpoker [ Ad, 6s ]
Player 3folds.
PacmanFL: 44% in the $1000's pretty damn impressive too
ZJustin raises (850) to 850
Zjustin 1 is all-In.
surrealpoker folds.
Some guy folds.
ZeeJustin folds.
Creating Main Pot with $1300 with ZJustin
** Summary **
Main Pot: 1300
Some guy balance 2165, lost 150 (folded)
ZeeJustin balance 2785, lost 300 (folded)
ZeJustin balance 2640, didn't bet (folded)
ZJustin balance 1300, bet 850, collected 1300, net +450
surrealpoker balance 1110, didn't bet (folded)

[/ QUOTE ]

Looks like wild speculation to me.

[/ QUOTE ]

[img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 03-27-2005, 02:01 PM
Daliman Daliman is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 382
Default Re: Daliman throws his hat in with the conspiracy theorists.

30% ITM if accurate and with equal distribution will lose $15 per tournament. I consider that bad, but player 2 in particular is horrible. About an hour earlier, he raised to 150 on me UTG 8 handed, had 680 left after it, I reraised him allin and he called my AKs with AJo without a moment's thought...then, in a step 5 later, he raised to 250 with blinds 25-50 from MP, had 400 left, and folded to the BB's all in....
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 03-27-2005, 02:03 PM
stupidsucker stupidsucker is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 33
Default Re: Daliman throws his hat in with the conspiracy theorists.

You can count me in as a person that feels there are things going on in online poker that are less honest then one might imagine. I wont go into detail.(this time)

I can say that none of it is going to stop me from playing(yet).
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 03-27-2005, 04:56 PM
Irieguy Irieguy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 340
Default Re: Daliman throws his hat in with the conspiracy theorists.

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]

If the Poker Genie gave me a 100K bankroll and the cosmic assurance that I was 8% better than the step 5 field, I still wouldn't play step 5's due to fear of collusion.

Irieguy

[/ QUOTE ]
What would the granted percentage have to be in order to play against 2 colluders?

[/ QUOTE ]

20%

Irieguy
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:54 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.