|
|
|
|
#1
12-04-2005, 03:38 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: PS $27 turbo: Defending blinds
[ QUOTE ]
There must be some raising range-pushing back range-calling range combination that cannot be improved upon: an equilibrium. Knowing this equilibrium and how to exploit situations where we expect our opponents to deviate from that equilibrium would appear to be useful. I'm not sure how to go about finding that equilibrium, though I may give a little trial and error a shot a bit later. [/ QUOTE ] eastbay would be the person to ask about this. He's posted about it before, and I think it's pretty easy to find using his SNGPT. 
|
|
#2
12-04-2005, 04:03 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: PS $27 turbo: Defending blinds
SNGPT does not take into consideration raises that are not all-in.
|
|
#3
12-04-2005, 04:24 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: PS $27 turbo: Defending blinds
[ QUOTE ]
SNGPT does not take into consideration raises that are not all-in. [/ QUOTE ] Thats true but you can vary some things in it to get an idea of what youre looking for. There are other tools as well. The point Im trying to make is, I think the most important thing is to have an idea of what you think he has, and what you think he might call with.
|
|
#4
12-04-2005, 04:31 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: PS $27 turbo: Defending blinds
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] SNGPT does not take into consideration raises that are not all-in. [/ QUOTE ] Thats true but you can vary some things in it to get an idea of what youre looking for. There are other tools as well. The point Im trying to make is, I think the most important thing is to have an idea of what you think he has, and what you think he might call with. [/ QUOTE ] This is along the lines of what Im trying to say here: link
|
 |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
