|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Curtains Hand #1
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] Betting this hand (TPWK) on the flop doesnt accomplish much with deepish stacks. If he misses he should bet most flops to try and take the pot right there. [/ QUOTE ] So if he gets top pair betting doesn't do him much good, but if he completely misses then he should bet? [/ QUOTE ] Thats my standard for the way I play...usually... If I'm playing a supreme LAG (in my home games) I'll bet out either way 'cuz I will get very loose calls...but in ANY other case... Check = hit Bet = miss Standard for me. [/ QUOTE ] I think that's standard for a lot of people, and I think it's easy to exploit if your opponent is observant enough to attach that read to you. It's universal enough that I assume my opponents play this way until I have a different read on them. Maybe curtains was hoping the villian had this read on him, hoping to make his check/call on the flop and check on the turn appear very strong. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Curtains Hand #1
[ QUOTE ]
I think that's standard for a lot of people, and I think it's easy to exploit if your opponent is observant enough to attach that read to you. It's universal enough that I assume my opponents play this way until I have a different read on them. Maybe curtains was hoping the villian had this read on him, hoping to make his check/call on the flop and check on the turn appear very strong. [/ QUOTE ] I mix in some bet out hits and I'm usually alright. I gotta say I have been surprised that no one has attached this read to me. ...maybe I bet enough hits that they wimp out on the half-read... Plus online, I don't really play with players who would notice this kinda thing... |
|
|