|
|
#18
11-21-2005, 03:15 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 44 blind defense
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] I think people sometimes over estimate how often you'll get a call from a non-pair hand, and under estimate how often a non-pair hand will bet when you show weakness by checking. [/ QUOTE ] Hm, my experience has been the complete opposite of this. [img]/images/graemlins/crazy.gif[/img] [/ QUOTE ] is this 1/2?? they check behind a lot at 1/2 and .5/1 .. but bet a shitton at 2/4, 3/6, 5/10(also more likely to raise the river) [/ QUOTE ] This is 1/2. However, I still think the play is the same, given my read. It's not like I'm facing an unknown player here. 
|
|
|
Threaded Mode