Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > General Gambling > Probability
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-27-2005, 10:37 AM
DavidC DavidC is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 292
Default Central Limit Theorem Question

I've sometimes heard people say that the Central Limit Theorem doesn't apply. I think this property of "non-applicableness" is called Statistical Fine Print, but I'm not sure.

So, two questions:

1) Is SFP a term that we use to describe situations where the CLT doesn't apply?

2) Does the CLT always apply if we were able to get an infinite sample? [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

i.e. Is SFP a matter of practicality as opposed to a mathematical absolute?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-27-2005, 10:46 AM
DavidC DavidC is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 292
Default Re: Central Limit Theorem Question

FWIW, I read something on the CLT, thought it's a pretty amazing piece of math, but I don't understand the section that goes into great detail on SFP. I THINK it involved integral calculations or something like that, and my stats background is only cursory, so I don't even understand what an integral is. [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-27-2005, 12:53 PM
AaronBrown AaronBrown is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: New York
Posts: 505
Default Re: Central Limit Theorem Question

"Statistical Fine Print" is a joking reference to the fact that there are some complicated conditions that must be met before it is safe to apply the central limit theorem. There are actually many versions of the central limit theorem (more SFP), but the most common application is to compute probabilities using only the mean and standard deviation.

For practical purposes, the three most common dangers to relying on the CLT is that your sample is not big enough, you are going too far into the tails or that your individual observations are not independent. The first two disappear if you get enough observations (but "enough" may mean more observations than could possibly fit in the known universe since the beginning of time), the last never disappears, even with an infinite sample.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-27-2005, 07:08 PM
DavidC DavidC is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 292
Default Re: Central Limit Theorem Question

Thanks, Aaron, and happy birthday, btw. I hope life is treating you well. [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

--Dave.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-28-2005, 06:14 AM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Central Limit Theorem Question

The CLT states that under some very general assumptions (finite variances ...) the probability distribution of the normalized sum of n independent random variables converges against the standard normal distribution.

So, the CLT does not apply for example if the variances of the random variables are not finite or not independent.

What do you want to compute? [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-29-2005, 12:00 AM
DoomSlice DoomSlice is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 582
Default Re: Central Limit Theorem Question

I was under the impression that there are several corrections that can be made for sample dependence, the ones that I know the most are for serially correlated observations.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-29-2005, 05:34 PM
AaronBrown AaronBrown is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: New York
Posts: 505
Default Re: Central Limit Theorem Question

Thank you. Life is treating me better than I deserve, that's all you can ask.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-29-2005, 05:37 PM
AaronBrown AaronBrown is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: New York
Posts: 505
Default Re: Central Limit Theorem Question

[ QUOTE ]
I was under the impression that there are several corrections that can be made for sample dependence, the ones that I know the most are for serially correlated observations.

[/ QUOTE ]
The trouble is these depend on knowing the precise nature of the serial correlation. They amount to subtracting out the known model and applying the CLT to the residuals.

As a practical matter, even small amounts of dependence can either invalidate the CLT or require unrealistically large numbers of observations.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:03 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.