Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Micro-Limits
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old 06-13-2005, 03:21 AM
Smasharoo Smasharoo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 236
Default Re: KJo in the BB

Oh while we're on the subject, I assume that your imaginary equity calculations include hands that we'd normally assume would be raised? AK/AA/ etc. etc.

Or do they take the fact that it's limped to you into account?

If they include hands that would normally be raised, clearly your equity is even higher that you indicate.
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 06-13-2005, 03:22 AM
Entity Entity is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: joining the U.S.S smallstakes
Posts: 3,786
Default Re: KJo in the BB

[ QUOTE ]
You're essentially saying that you wouldn't make a +EV play because...it's not easy?

[/ QUOTE ]

I'm saying I may not make a +EV play if it gives me a higher chance of making a much more +EV play later, and just as importantly, decreases my chances of making a -EV play later in the hand.

Rob
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 06-13-2005, 03:23 AM
Smasharoo Smasharoo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 236
Default Re: KJo in the BB


I asked you a simple question: are you raising A5s here?


I asked you a simple one. Are you not making +EV plays pre-flop because it's too hard for you to deal with postflop?
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 06-13-2005, 03:23 AM
Entity Entity is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: joining the U.S.S smallstakes
Posts: 3,786
Default Re: KJo in the BB

[ QUOTE ]
Oh while we're on the subject, I assume that your imaginary equity calculations include hands that we'd normally assume would be raised? AK/AA/ etc. etc.

Or do they take the fact that it's limped to you into account?

If they include hands that would normally be raised, clearly your equity is even higher that you indicate.

[/ QUOTE ]

My equity calculations were being generous (as your average limpers are not 55-60% VPIP'ers) to compensate for the fact that I did not remove certain hands from the range. I can remove those hands if necessary and rerun the sims.
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 06-13-2005, 03:25 AM
Smasharoo Smasharoo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 236
Default Re: KJo in the BB


I'm saying I may not make a +EV play if it gives me a higher chance of making a much more +EV play later, and just as importantly, decreases my chances of making a -EV play later in the hand.


Might be better to refine your postflop play so that you're not makig -EV plays because you raised when you were in a +EV situation pre-flop.
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 06-13-2005, 03:25 AM
Jakesta Jakesta is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: in the fishbowl
Posts: 1,144
Default Re: KJo in the BB

Now you are just being insulting to Entity.
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 06-13-2005, 03:27 AM
Smasharoo Smasharoo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 236
Default Re: KJo in the BB


My equity calculations were being generous (as your average limpers are not 55-60% VPIP'ers) to compensate for the fact that I did not remove certain hands from the range. I can remove those hands if necessary and rerun the sims.


Or I could throw darts at a dartboard with various equity percentages on it for an equal level of accuraccy.

Including hands that crush KJ which are normally raised is disingenous at best.

If you don't raise it because you find it easier to play that way, just say so.

There's not a good objective argument for checking.
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 06-13-2005, 03:29 AM
Smasharoo Smasharoo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 236
Default Re: KJo in the BB



Now you are just being insulting to Entity.


How am I being insulting?

If I told you I didn't raise AA because I felt that when i did I could never get away from it postflop wouldn't you tell me I'd be better off raising it and fixing my postflop play?
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 06-13-2005, 03:29 AM
Jakesta Jakesta is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: in the fishbowl
Posts: 1,144
Default Re: KJo in the BB

Listen, I think what Entity is trying to say is that by avoiding bloating the pot with a preflop raise(even though the raise is +EV), he can better outplay his opponents after the flop, in a smaller pot(in terms of SB).

This, to me, is similar to Ed Miller's advocating waiting to raise certain hands until the turn, where the bet size doubles, and you can outplay your opponents on fourth street instead of pumping the flop.

You sacrifice a TINY bit of EV preflop in return for gaining MORE EV later on where you can demonstrate your better postflop skills. Just like waiting till the turn where the bet sizes double so you can give incorrect odds to crappy draws.

Am I close, Entity?
Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old 06-13-2005, 03:32 AM
damaniac damaniac is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Not stopping running QB\'s
Posts: 60
Default Re: KJo in the BB

P. 88, SSHE:

You often make an important trade off when you raise before the flop. When you have a pot equity edge, your raise has an immediate positive expectation because you will win more than your fair share. But that raise simultaneously cuts your postflop expectation.

I suspect this is what he means.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:41 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.