Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Other Topics > Science, Math, and Philosophy
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 08-04-2005, 08:34 PM
stinkypete stinkypete is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Toronto
Posts: 412
Default Re: math problem

[ QUOTE ]
I was at Foxwoods the other night, and instead of trying to have winning session, I was concentrating on chip shuffling. I was trying to figure out a formula for how many iterations it takes two stacks of n chips to get back to their original configuration, assuming you shuffle them perfectly, and the stack on the left always contributes the bottom chip to the shuffled stack.

[/ QUOTE ]

is the stack on the left the top half or the bottom half of the single stack?
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 08-04-2005, 10:58 PM
kpux kpux is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Donkeytown
Posts: 83
Default Re: math problem

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I was at Foxwoods the other night, and instead of trying to have winning session, I was concentrating on chip shuffling. I was trying to figure out a formula for how many iterations it takes two stacks of n chips to get back to their original configuration, assuming you shuffle them perfectly, and the stack on the left always contributes the bottom chip to the shuffled stack.

[/ QUOTE ]

is the stack on the left the top half or the bottom half of the single stack?

[/ QUOTE ]

The top half of the single stack always becomes the right stack.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 08-06-2005, 10:13 PM
stinkypete stinkypete is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Toronto
Posts: 412
Default Re: math problem

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I was at Foxwoods the other night, and instead of trying to have winning session, I was concentrating on chip shuffling. I was trying to figure out a formula for how many iterations it takes two stacks of n chips to get back to their original configuration, assuming you shuffle them perfectly, and the stack on the left always contributes the bottom chip to the shuffled stack.

[/ QUOTE ]

is the stack on the left the top half or the bottom half of the single stack?

[/ QUOTE ]

The top half of the single stack always becomes the right stack.

[/ QUOTE ]

this means the bottom chip never changes. dumb.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 08-07-2005, 03:49 AM
kpux kpux is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Donkeytown
Posts: 83
Default Re: math problem

have you even tried to work through the problem?
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 08-07-2005, 03:57 AM
kpux kpux is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Donkeytown
Posts: 83
Default Re: math problem

[ QUOTE ]
If you express the shuffle as a permutation in cycle notation the least common multiple of the cycle lengths is the number of shuffles required. This is basically restating the period thing earlier, but provides a more systematic approach. Now I simply need a quick way to get the cycle lengths and I will be done.

[/ QUOTE ]

yeah, we figured out that number of shuffles required is the LCM of all of the cycle lengths.

one problem i thought of with using permutation groups was that if you number the chips, say, 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8, with 1 2 3 4 being the left stack from bottom to top (and the two stacks are different colors, obviously), then the permutation group answer will tell you how many riffles you need to return to 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8. but there are other visually identical permutations like 1 3 2 4 5 7 6 8 that maybe occur before the original order occurs again, which would mean that the number of riffles needed is less than what the permutation answer would say. hope that isn't too convoluted.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 08-07-2005, 08:48 AM
ACPlayer ACPlayer is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Foxwoods, Atlantic City, NY, Boston
Posts: 1,089
Default Re: math problem

Here is a link I found.

Shuffle stuff

[ QUOTE ]
It turns out that an ordinary deck of 52 cards is returned to its original order after eight out-shuffles. It's also possible to move the top card of a deck to any location by using the right combination of in- and out-shuffles.



[/ QUOTE ]

There is an interesting related issue.

How many shuffles does it take to randomize deck? Any one care to research? I remember reading about this back in my blackjack days, when I was keen on shuffle tracking -- though I never got anywhere with it in practice.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:23 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.