#31
|
|||
|
|||
Why are you still allowed to post here?
You. Cheating. Scum.
|
#32
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Confessions of a Winholdem User
[ QUOTE ]
festus, fair enough, thanks for making our point for us, well done. it is one thing to openly discuss poker theory in vague general terms in inexact english. such advice seems innocuous enough because it is just poker players talking about how they play the game. the moment you have a formula driven bot, things change, those who were outspoken about some "play it this way" situation now come to grips with the very present reality that there is some machine out there that can now behave the way you tell it to. so people who were not 100% sure about advice given might hold back. and those who were very sure about advice given or not will probably hold back because (and here is the point) - - good solid poker advice has real value, genuine value. so now that there is a machine that can implement round optimal advice (soon to be hand optimal), people are holding back. there are formula sets for winholdem that have far more value than the $100 cost for the machine. at some point, one of these sets will become public knowledge, it is inevitable. winholdem support. http://www.pokerbot.com [/ QUOTE ] Or maybe it's because no one here wants to help a bunch of incompetent morons with their scam. |
|
|