Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > PL/NL Texas Hold'em > Small Stakes Pot-, No-Limit Hold'em
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 12-23-2005, 04:00 PM
Morrek Morrek is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 4
Default Re: Top set--No bet

I would call if I got (implied) odds to fill up
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 12-23-2005, 04:02 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Top set--No bet

Just call and fold turn unimproved? Don't you think someone in position will raise this flop with AdAx or KdKx?
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 12-23-2005, 04:09 PM
Morrek Morrek is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 4
Default Re: Top set--No bet

Well, it does depend alot on the player, and how much we have behind us(and how likely he is to pay off with a made flush on paired board). I do prefer to not go allin on the flop though, atleast without a good read. I might bet turn if there's enough room to fold to an allin, or check/call if he's usually beting weak.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 12-23-2005, 04:11 PM
Morrek Morrek is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 4
Default Re: Top set--No bet

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I'd pot flop and then go from there, preferebly not put much more money in the pot without improving.

[/ QUOTE ]

What happens if:

Villain min raises flop.

Villain makes a pot size raise.

Villain just calls.

[/ QUOTE ]

Villain minraise, I call.
Potsized raise I think it's push or fold, depends on feel/read but I do both with a little err on the fold side probably against an unknown.
Villain calls, I bet turn regardless of what falls, however if a diamond falls and he raises I'll probably fold, unless he gives me odds.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 12-23-2005, 04:24 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Top set--No bet

I would think we lead flop for 3/4 to PSB and I'd probably push over the top of any raise, especially one by the button who could be on an overpair with a diamond. This could also put a sqeeze play on MP who may be drawing to a 4th diamond and might fold under pressure.

I just don't think I could fold on this flop to a raise. Especially since we can stack someone if we boat up.

c/r seems bad here. I don't think we gain any information or folding equity by it. If the button is playing AA or KK with a diamond I think he calls the push thinking he's either ahead or has enough outs.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 12-23-2005, 05:41 PM
ajmargarine ajmargarine is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Pwning Robby Gordon
Posts: 798
Default Re: Top set--No bet

I would like to hear more about c/r vs. leading PSB here. I've been thinking about this and haven't really wrapped my head around it yet. I think the chances of me being raised are close to zero if I lead. I am happy to get it in on the flop. I think a c/r does have more FE than you guys are giving credit for. Still pondering.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 12-23-2005, 06:06 PM
Morrek Morrek is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 4
Default Re: Top set--No bet

[ QUOTE ]
I would like to hear more about c/r vs. leading PSB here. I've been thinking about this and haven't really wrapped my head around it yet. I think the chances of me being raised are close to zero if I lead. I am happy to get it in on the flop. I think a c/r does have more FE than you guys are giving credit for. Still pondering.

[/ QUOTE ]

Yeah it probably has some FE, but it's more likely to be called when you're behind and win small pot when you're ahead. So I like to play these kinds of hands a little more safe and just bet out.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 12-23-2005, 06:33 PM
mulebennett mulebennett is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 17
Default Re: Top set--No bet

i'm no expert but i've always thought that if you lead the flop with a made set, especially on a draw-heavy board, it makes your decisions a lot easier for you. on this board i definitely come out firing, and if i get raised, push the flop. obviously this is read-dependent, but i think fancy play is dangerous on a three-flush flop.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 12-23-2005, 06:35 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Top set--No bet

It seems that this is a quantitative question. i've wondered about it before, so I did the math for the flop... I hope.

p(specific two suited, when 3 of same are on the flop) =0.06 per person
p(no flush per person) = 0.9538
opponents = 7
p(no flush at table)= 0.72 (this is a suprise to me)

EV

You make full/quads: 0.22 x 1 (fraction you win)
You are unimproved: 0.78 x 0.37 (fraction you win when your opponent doesn't have, or make, a flush; =1-(0.28 (has flush) + 0.35 (makes flush)

EV = 0.51

So, given overlay the flop must be played. I have no idea how often villian folds to a push here. Maybe someone who is mathy can take this further to argue an optimal play?
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:00 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.