|
|
#11
11-15-2005, 08:49 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Have you played with me? 5/10
I don't understand why you refuse to accept the fact that this kind of winrate over a 30k hand stretch is entirely possible even for expert players.
From what I understand, you play an insane number of hands, which could be contributing to the tilt, but that's only something you could know. 
|
|
#12
11-15-2005, 08:52 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Have you played with me? 5/10
I didn't say that I saw anything wron with the hand that I posted. In fact, I thought it was played well. A fair question would be "Why did you post that hand?".
|
|
#13
11-15-2005, 08:56 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Have you played with me? 5/10
[ QUOTE ]
The glaringly obvious faults to me were that you overdefend your blind, and cant let small pots go (for what its worth) [/ QUOTE ] Probably true...I hate folding and calling down too much is probably where I go wrong a lot. [ QUOTE ] I was the one you advised to 3bet AJs. [/ QUOTE ] Yeah, from my perspective you really need to up your pf aggression. Thanks for the tips. -SmileyEH
|
|
#16
11-15-2005, 08:57 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Have you played with me? 5/10
[ QUOTE ]
Betting out with Ace-high on the river wasn't wise [/ QUOTE ] Would you mind posting that hand? I was going nuts on that table, and then I went card dead so my image was useless [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img]. -SmileyEH
|
|
#18
11-15-2005, 08:59 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Have you played with me? 5/10
[ QUOTE ]
weren't you the guy who said anyone could make a decent living at 2/4? [/ QUOTE ] Actually he was the guy beating 2/4 for 800 BB/100 over one billion hands.
|
|
#19
11-15-2005, 09:02 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Have you played with me? 5/10
[ QUOTE ]
I don't understand why you refuse to accept the fact that this kind of winrate over a 30k hand stretch is entirely possible even for expert players. From what I understand, you play an insane number of hands, which could be contributing to the tilt, but that's only something you could know. [/ QUOTE ] I certainly realize that fact. I don't think I've been running that bad however so I should be doing much better than 1BB/100. I did 4 times that winrate at 2/4 for about 130k hands and I don't think the difficulty jump in stakes should drop my winrate that much. (If you accept that my long term winrate at 2/4 is at least 3.5/100 that is - between 1 and 2SD's from my recorded winrate) I've played very few hands, and actually I think it has worsened my psychological outlook. When I was 8tabling 2/4 over the summer havingn a losing day was rare as I was putting in at least 2k hands a day, a losing week an impossibility. Playing 3-4k hands a week (while I was in Europe) made it easy to have a losing week, and this often left me dejected about the variance. -SmileyEH
|
|
#20
11-15-2005, 09:02 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Have you played with me? 5/10
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] weren't you the guy who said anyone could make a decent living at 2/4? [/ QUOTE ] Actually he was the guy beating 2/4 for 800 BB/100 over one billion hands. [/ QUOTE ] It was 4.3 over 130k hands. -SmileyEH
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
