($33) Playing from the blinds: 86o

[Pasterbator]

I hate it too. Sometimes i'll lead out for 75, sometimes i'll check and watch the action. Theres really no method to my madness.

[Scuba Chuck]

[ QUOTE ]
I hate it too. Sometimes i'll lead out for 75, sometimes i'll check and watch the action. Theres really no method to my madness.

[/ QUOTE ]

I hate leading. Your reverse implied odds on future streets sucks donkey d*!#$%

[Pasterbator]

good call, maybe thats a leak i can plug.

Thanks future villain.

[adanthar]

I like leading vs. two opponents but three's about my limit. It's not reverse implied odds, it's just 'hey, do I have the best hand? No? OK then.'

When you check and there's a bet/call in front, you are equally well off pushing with 72o.

I personally would check/fold, but I play really weak early.

[ZeroPointMachine]

[ QUOTE ]
I like leading vs. two opponents but three's about my limit. It's not reverse implied odds, it's just 'hey, do I have the best hand? No? OK then.'

When you check and there's a bet/call in front, you are equally well off pushing with 72o.

[/ QUOTE ]

I'm more inclined to lead into a flop with no flush draw. With the possibility of suited overcards playing back at me I prefer to check and see what develops.

[ilya]

[ QUOTE ]

When you check and there's a bet/call in front, you are equally well off pushing with 72o.

[/ QUOTE ]

Oh come on, now you're just being melodramatic.

vs. 72o 86

AcKc 14% 48%

99 5.5% 23.7%

A8o 5.7% 16.7%

AcKc & 99 3% 16%

[yvesaint]

[ QUOTE ]

I hate leading. Your reverse implied odds on future streets sucks donkey d*!#$%

[/ QUOTE ]

reverse implied odds only works if you plan on getting stacked with 86o on a 8-high flop

i think your check-raise all-in sucks, you might as well have bottom pair here

on a two tone flop, im most likely check-folding, especially to this action. on a rainbow flow id prefer to lead.

[Scuba Chuck]

Great 9 responses of "yuk"

Now it's just post count fodder.

ewwwww