Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > General Poker Discussion > Poker Beats, Brags, and Variance

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 12-25-2005, 12:41 AM
Nepa Nepa is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: PA
Posts: 133
Default Re: Statistically Possible???

[ QUOTE ]
OK...been tracking my beats today while 4-tabling Stars SnGos...here's what I have so far...

KK v 69os (Lost)
AK v A7os (Lost)
AQ v A4h (Lost)
KJ v K10 (Lost)
A8h v K8os (Lost)
QQ v A2os (Lost)

Seriously, WTF???

These are situations where I'm well ahead on the flop and then boom, turn and river F**K me good.

[/ QUOTE ]

Dude, I feel your pain.

When your running bad your running bad.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 12-25-2005, 01:22 AM
jman220 jman220 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: No Poker Sept-May
Posts: 822
Default Re: Statistically Possible???

Hand 1: fold preflop.
Hand 2: fold preflop.
Hand 3: fold preflop.
Hand 4: fold preflop.
Hand 5: fold preflop.
Hand 6: fold preflop.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 12-25-2005, 01:34 AM
Hojglad Hojglad is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 0
Default Re: Statistically Possible???

[ QUOTE ]
Hand 1: fold preflop.
Hand 2: fold preflop.
Hand 3: fold preflop.
Hand 4: fold preflop.
Hand 5: fold preflop.
Hand 6: fold preflop.

[/ QUOTE ]
[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 12-25-2005, 01:37 AM
surfinillini surfinillini is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 5
Default Re: Statistically Possible???

[ QUOTE ]
Hand 1: fold preflop.
Hand 2: fold preflop.
Hand 3: fold preflop.
Hand 4: fold preflop.
Hand 5: fold preflop.
Hand 6: fold preflop.

[/ QUOTE ]

RIIIIIIIIIIIGHT
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 12-25-2005, 03:22 AM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Statistically Possible???

I lost 3 times with a full house to quads in one session. Bummer.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 12-25-2005, 03:07 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Statistically Possible???

I just ran these through pokerstove, and OMFGLOL, it says 0% probability of having them all lose, so yeah it is statistically impossible! Definitive proof that online poker is teh rig.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 12-25-2005, 03:47 PM
surfinillini surfinillini is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 5
Default Re: Statistically Possible???

[ QUOTE ]
I just ran these through pokerstove, and OMFGLOL, it says 0% probability of having them all lose, so yeah it is statistically impossible! Definitive proof that online poker is teh rig.

[/ QUOTE ]

LMAO

these happened all in succession so I was just wondering what the sample/(n!-1) equation came out to.

thanks
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:20 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, vBulletin Solutions Inc.