|
|
#22
01-17-2005, 11:25 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Typical Party 2/4 and 3/6 table these days
well, for tonight at least, i retract my previous statements. these are the tightest games i've ever seen on party... christ, i felt lucky to get three to a flop there for a while. i'll try back tomorrow.
|
|
#23
01-17-2005, 11:43 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Typical Party 2/4 and 3/6 table these days
obviously we all like having a couple of 70/20 idiots in our games.
But I wouldn't mind playing on this table. The 31/6 and 33/7 guys should be very beatable. the 11/6 and 13/4 guys are just BEGGING to be pushed around. no, it's not the greatest game I've ever seen. And I agree that all the multi-tabling 2+2'ers are making the overall texture of the games a bit tighter....but you should still be able to win on these games. Just because someone is so tight that they are a 13/4 rock doesn't mean they can't be beaten. Just my opinion though. Obviously I'm going to try to get on the types of tables that we all prefer. Right now the table that i'm playing on has players who are seat 1 - 26/3 seat 2 - me (19/10) seat 3 - 24/12 seat 4 - 14/8 seat 5 - 27/3 seat 6 - 23/5 seat 7 - 15/11 seat 8 - 26/2 seat 9 - 39/17 seat 10 - brand new I have position on seat 9 and he's over-anxious on his blind-steals. seats 1, 5 and 8 are WAY too passive. seat 6 doesn't impress me a whole lot either. I'm sticking around for now because this seems to be pretty beatable imo.
|
|
#25
01-17-2005, 11:56 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 2/4 party empire
[ QUOTE ]
at least 2/3 rocks and a eagle or money bag at every table. [/ QUOTE ] Eagle... This is from Phil Hellmuths book right.. ha. "I can not even talk about the Eagle, it is beyond the scope of this book"... soooo dumb
|
|
#26
01-17-2005, 11:59 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Typical Party 2/4 and 3/6 table these days
[ QUOTE ]
I can tell you from experience that the 11/6/3 guy does not get pushed around. He doesn't play a lot of hands, but he is very aggressive when he is in a pot. [/ QUOTE ] but how much money do you think he is gonna make off a 2+2er? if he raises, get the [censored] out! since rocks aren't in many pots with you, they don't really hurt you as much as the normal tight-aggressives. i wonder how much money a 11/6/3 player can make at 2/4? probably a little less variance, but his winrate must be a lot lower than possible. i guess if he is smart enough to know who the solid tags are, he can probably use his rockishness to his advantage.
|
|
#27
01-18-2005, 12:02 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Typical Party 2/4 and 3/6 table these days
[ QUOTE ]
 The first four tables that I opened at random looked like this. Looks like a great game, doesn't it? [img]/images/graemlins/smirk.gif[/img] [/ QUOTE ] LOL I love it when the people obscure the sns but forget the most important things... SO HILARIOUS
|
|
#29
01-18-2005, 12:06 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Typical Party 2/4 and 3/6 table these days
[ QUOTE ]
i wonder how much money a 11/6/3 player can make at 2/4? probably a little less variance, but his winrate must be a lot lower than possible. i guess if he is smart enough to know who the solid tags are, he can probably use his rockishness to his advantage. [/ QUOTE ] I don't consider 11/6/3 to be a rock. 11/3/1 is a rock. 11/6/3 is tight/aggressive.
|
|
#30
01-18-2005, 12:09 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Typical Party 2/4 and 3/6 table these days
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] i wonder how much money a 11/6/3 player can make at 2/4? probably a little less variance, but his winrate must be a lot lower than possible. i guess if he is smart enough to know who the solid tags are, he can probably use his rockishness to his advantage. [/ QUOTE ] I don't consider 11/6/3 to be a rock. 11/3/1 is a rock. 11/6/3 is tight/aggressive. [/ QUOTE ] But he is also not playing optimally. There are certainly many +EV situations he is passing up.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
