Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Micro-Limits
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-21-2005, 04:38 PM
JapaneseSandman JapaneseSandman is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 21
Default Was totaly nuts or just good agressive poker?

Party Poker 1/2 Hold'em (10 handed) converter

Preflop: Hero is UTG+1 with K[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img], Q[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img].
UTG calls, Hero calls, <font color="#666666">4 folds</font>, <font color="#CC3333">CO raises</font>, <font color="#666666">3 folds</font>, UTG calls, Hero calls.

Flop: (7.50 SB) 9[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img], A[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img], J[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(3 players)</font>
UTG checks, Hero checks, <font color="#CC3333">CO bets</font>, UTG calls, <font color="#CC3333">Hero raises</font>, CO calls, UTG folds.

Turn: (6.25 BB) 9[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(2 players)</font>
<font color="#CC3333">Hero bets</font>, CO calls.

River: (8.25 BB) A[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(2 players)</font>
<font color="#CC3333">Hero bets</font>, CO folds.

Final Pot: 9.25 BB
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-21-2005, 04:39 PM
sy_or_bust sy_or_bust is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 169
Default Re: Was totaly nuts or just good agressive poker?

Pretty bad.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-21-2005, 04:40 PM
flopwell flopwell is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: donating at .25/.5 Paradise
Posts: 218
Default Re: Was totaly nuts or just good agressive poker?

where was that post about flooding the forum?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-21-2005, 04:42 PM
VTDuffman VTDuffman is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Duff Gardens
Posts: 44
Default Re: Was totaly nuts or just good agressive poker?

It was nuts, just because you won doesn't make it good. You're being results-oriented. Yeah, you won this hand, but what if he called you and had an A or a 9? You would have lost, then would you have thought it was "good, agressive, play?" Probably not.

Agression is good, but you need *some* Semblance of a hand on which ot be agressive with.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-21-2005, 04:42 PM
flopwell flopwell is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: donating at .25/.5 Paradise
Posts: 218
Default Re: Was totaly nuts or just good agressive poker?

Sandman, read this post, pleas

http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/sh...amp;PHPSESSID=
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-21-2005, 04:43 PM
macdaddy991 macdaddy991 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 9
Default Re: Was totaly nuts or just good agressive poker?

If he is betting his ace, you are very behind. If he is betting his draw, you may be ahead, and have the nut flush redraw. Betting the turn is bad here. Now you are drawing only to a ten if you are behind, and he would have checked behind if he was on a draw. I would rather check the turn and bet the river if the flush didn't fall.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-21-2005, 04:45 PM
einbert einbert is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: in sklansky i trust
Posts: 2,190
Default Re: Was totaly nuts or just good agressive poker?

This is a little bad. I'm surprised to see you lagging it up after you said you would fold ATs from the BB to a CO raise. What gives?

First of all, I would raise PF. It's close of course, but I think it's a raise. In this case it would have defined CO's hand more clearly.

Just call on the flop. You aren't protecting anything, you're most likely beat and have four outs. You have enough to call one bet with your 4 gutshot outs + 1.5 BD Flush outs, but raising here is not smart--especially after UTG has already called CO's bet. You're not taking the pot down here and you're not taking the pot down often enough on the turn to make this worthwhile.

Since you did manage to get it HU on the turn, I don't mind the bet. You can fold to a raise here so betting isn't bad.

On the river, think of CO's possible hands. If he has a J he's calling you down. If he has an A he's probably raising. With a PP &gt;9 he's calling you too. He will never call with anything you beat, and he will call with just about everything that beats you. Check to him. If you have him pegged as an aggressive player who will bluff here with nothing, call his bet. Otherwise fold.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 02-21-2005, 05:28 PM
rmarotti rmarotti is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Hibernating
Posts: 36
Default Re: Was totaly nuts or just good agressive poker?

yuck.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 02-21-2005, 05:31 PM
JapaneseSandman JapaneseSandman is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 21
Default Re: Was totaly nuts or just good agressive poker?

So my first impression was right this was crazy and lucky. My problem is that I'm new to this level and I am bouncing back and forth between seeing monsters under the bed and not seeing anything at all. Thanks
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 02-21-2005, 08:11 PM
KingOtter KingOtter is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 667
Default Re: Was totaly nuts or just good agressive poker?

Yes, this is nuts.

You only have a backdoor flush draw, and a gutshot straight. Both of these are very weak draws.

You had odds to call on the flop, but would have had to fold the river.

Have you read SSH? Or any other 2+2 books yet? This isn't meant to be sarcastic or condescending. You may need to go back and re-read if you have, because you're missing some key hand-reading skills.

KO
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:27 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.