Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Mid- and High-Stakes Hold'em
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 11-21-2005, 08:48 PM
ggbman ggbman is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 605
Default Re: party 30/60 hand I\'m not happy with

[ QUOTE ]
It may be results oriented to say call the river. And I do like folding the turn. But I think calling the river is consistent with calling the turn. What I'd like is someone to explain why calling the turn and folding the river is correct taking into account the size of the pot and the likelihood that UTG is second best to you.

[/ QUOTE ]

Paluka felt that there was a decent chance people would semi-bluff the turn, but there was almost 0% liklihood that someone would follow through into 2 people on the river with a hand worse than his. I understand his thought process, but i still advocate either folding the turn of calling down. (And i lean very heavily towards folding the turn) Basically the pot was laying him like 10-1, so he has to have the best hand 10% of th time to overcall this river. I think he might be lucky to have the best hand 5% o the time here. This was just a circumstance where he got shown worse hands and wanted to confirm that his play was ok, which i think it was. (although i fold 1 street earlier)
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 11-21-2005, 08:53 PM
RED_RAIN RED_RAIN is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Plymouth, MN
Posts: 11
Default Re: party 30/60 hand I\'m not happy with

[ QUOTE ]
Also, i'm sure you know what you're doing preflop, but i have hard time imagining you give up much (if anything) by mucking this preflop.

[/ QUOTE ]

I also call this late position after limpers. Am I wrong to?
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 11-21-2005, 08:56 PM
Justin A Justin A is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: I travel the world and the seven seas
Posts: 494
Default Re: party 30/60 hand I\'m not happy with

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Also, i'm sure you know what you're doing preflop, but i have hard time imagining you give up much (if anything) by mucking this preflop.

[/ QUOTE ]

I also call this late position after limpers. Am I wrong to?

[/ QUOTE ]

No. This is a pretty standard call against likely bad playing opponents.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 11-21-2005, 09:06 PM
roy_miami roy_miami is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 104
Default Re: party 30/60 hand I\'m not happy with

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Also, i'm sure you know what you're doing preflop, but i have hard time imagining you give up much (if anything) by mucking this preflop.

[/ QUOTE ]

I also call this late position after limpers. Am I wrong to?

[/ QUOTE ]

GAMBLE IT UP DERB!!!!!!

just kidding, I play JTo, K9o, QTo even 9To sometimes in late position after limpers. QJ is pretty compared to those hands.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 11-21-2005, 09:09 PM
Paluka Paluka is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: New York
Posts: 373
Default Re: party 30/60 hand I\'m not happy with

There doesn't seem to be a lot of consensus on how to play this hand. I thought it was a tough spot.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 11-21-2005, 09:20 PM
shemp shemp is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 401
Default Re: party 30/60 hand I\'m not happy with

So what happened was a 20:1 shot or worse that Paluka just happened to witness? O rly. That seems quite a bit long to me. Not 1 in 10 but fewer than 1 in 20 unknown Party 30 players is this goofy. You might be right. I'm skeptical.
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 11-21-2005, 09:26 PM
shemp shemp is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 401
Default Re: party 30/60 hand I\'m not happy with

Would you have called the river if UTG folded? Would those who laugh at my view/argument agree with that fold?
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 11-21-2005, 09:35 PM
haakee haakee is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 416
Default Re: party 30/60 hand I\'m not happy with

I don't like the spot you're in on the turn here. There's a chance you might have the best hand, but you'll have to fold the river to a bet-call in front of you if you decide to call the turn.

I would play it the same way you did PF and on the flop (although sometimes I'd smooth-call the flop and raise the turn). On the turn I would sit and agonize for a little bit, think to myself "This sucks, I might be ahead here" then click the fold button.
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 11-21-2005, 10:02 PM
Paluka Paluka is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: New York
Posts: 373
Default Re: party 30/60 hand I\'m not happy with

[ QUOTE ]
So what happened was a 20:1 shot or worse that Paluka just happened to witness? O rly. That seems quite a bit long to me. Not 1 in 10 but fewer than 1 in 20 unknown Party 30 players is this goofy. You might be right. I'm skeptical.

[/ QUOTE ]

I witnessed a 1 outer once. Does that mean it wasn't a 1 outer? A 1 in 20 shot isn't all that rare.
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 11-21-2005, 10:02 PM
Paluka Paluka is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: New York
Posts: 373
Default Re: party 30/60 hand I\'m not happy with

[ QUOTE ]
Would you have called the river if UTG folded? Would those who laugh at my view/argument agree with that fold?

[/ QUOTE ]

I would have called the river if utg folded, although it is really hard to put utg on a hand that beats me.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:32 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.