Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > 2+2 Communities > Other Other Topics

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 10-21-2005, 09:18 AM
mason55 mason55 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: All Sin Begins With Emotion
Posts: 801
Default Re: hey {censored}

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
keep it up, you are doing a god job, fcuk all the haters just ban them because they all suck.

[/ QUOTE ]

The only thing he ever did wrong was banning darynisright.

[/ QUOTE ]

I thought I was the only one that liked that account.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 10-21-2005, 09:24 AM
mslif mslif is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Understanding pde\'s
Posts: 902
Default Re: hey {censored}

this thread is a direct violation of:
Rule 7.Threads about others posters are almost universally stupid. Especially nasty threads. Unless you are 100% sure that is it a good or funny story or something similar don't do this.

Also he cannot get your name right which is really a shame. He is also breaking the rule about posting on a topic related to your moderation of this forum.
People have been banned for less.

Edit: As Mason pointed out, the post was made 2 weeks ago. I seriously need coffee
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 10-21-2005, 09:25 AM
mason55 mason55 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: All Sin Begins With Emotion
Posts: 801
Default Re: hey {censored}

This post was made 2 weeks ago before the rules were written down and fleshed out.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 10-21-2005, 09:29 AM
El Barto El Barto is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 119
Default Re: hey {censored}

TSC doesn't know the difference between the { and the [.

{{{ [[[ [img]/images/graemlins/smirk.gif[/img] ]]] }}}
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 10-21-2005, 09:33 AM
mslif mslif is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Understanding pde\'s
Posts: 902
Default Re: hey {censored}

[ QUOTE ]
This post was made 2 weeks ago before the rules were written down and fleshed out.

[/ QUOTE ]

Thank you, I had not noticed the date. [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 10-21-2005, 09:33 AM
HopeydaFish HopeydaFish is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 151
Default Re: hey {censored}

Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 10-21-2005, 09:42 AM
bwana devil bwana devil is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: austin
Posts: 85
Default Re: hey {censored}

[ QUOTE ]
keep it up, you are doing a god job, fcuk all the haters just ban them because they all suck.

[/ QUOTE ]

im not sure how this post is not a bannable offense. [censored] is banning anyone who starts new threads on his moderating decisions and has made that clear.

btw i like TSC. i dont want him banned. just pointing out the inconsistency in [censored] ‘s decision to only ban people who start threads who disagree w/ his moderating decisions.

[censored], could you give your reasoning?

bwana
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 10-21-2005, 10:11 AM
RunDownHouse RunDownHouse is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 165
Default Re: hey {censored}

[ QUOTE ]
im not sure how this post is not a bannable offense. [censored] is banning anyone who starts new threads on his moderating decisions and has made that clear.

[/ QUOTE ]
How about it is something like 2 weeks old?

Furthermore, [censored] isn't obligated to explain himself to anyone. Personally, I think he should ban RacersEdge for the retarded bump.

EDIT: OK, as said in another thread, I'm an idiot. It looks like I was out of line. Apologies.
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 10-21-2005, 10:15 AM
ChipWrecked ChipWrecked is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 667
Default Re: hey {censored}

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
keep it up, you are doing a god job, fcuk all the haters just ban them because they all suck.

[/ QUOTE ]

im not sure how this post is not a bannable offense. [censored] is banning anyone who starts new threads on his moderating decisions and has made that clear.

btw i like TSC. i dont want him banned. just pointing out the inconsistency in [censored] ‘s decision to only ban people who start threads who disagree w/ his moderating decisions.

[censored], could you give your reasoning?

bwana

[/ QUOTE ]

Yeah, um, this thread hasn't been locked or any bans partially because it is in the sticky as 'A basic [censored] sucks thread'. No need to bump or add to it.
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 10-21-2005, 10:21 AM
razor razor is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 1
Default Re: hey {censored}

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
im not sure how this post is not a bannable offense. [censored] is banning anyone who starts new threads on his moderating decisions and has made that clear.

[/ QUOTE ]
How about it is something like 2 weeks old?

Furthermore, [censored] isn't obligated to explain himself to anyone. Personally, I think he should ban RacersEdge for the retarded bump. Did he actually dig through 20 pages or whatever of OOT just to bump this? Christ. But whether he does or doesn't, I'm not somehow entitled to know his reasoning.

[/ QUOTE ]

This is one of the threads [censored] links to in his sticky as a thread to express opinions on the job he is doing.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:51 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.