150k hand checkup

[fairness]

what are you tryin to say?

[matt hooley]

solid?

[Piiop]

IT'S A ROCK

[JDErickson]

I have calculated and have come to the conclusion that you need 186,053 hands to be sure of your win rate.

SO come back when your sample size is more in line.

[sin808]

that's ALOT of hands for .50/1

[kiemo]

Here I thought I was a tighty at 17% VP.

[fairness]

i thought the zoo was the internet forum

[blackaces13]

Ok so illunious' play is extremely tight, but look at that win rate. I bet there are few players here with PT and a lot of .5/1 hands, say 60-70K who can boast one significantly higher.

So isn't it possible that supertight is right at .5/1 amidst the unbluffable calling stations? Maybe the style advocated here with all of its semi-bluffing and raising overcards or 99/AJo UTG does fall under "fancy play syndrome" or just aggression for aggressions sake at times

At a level like 2/4 it may be different but I have also found that at .5/1 the more straightforward, simple, and patient I play the better I do.

[uuDevil]

So assuming a SD of 16 BB/100 hands, I get a 95% confidence interval of 3.6 to 5.1 BB/100. Awesome!

Sure seems like you could loosen up a little, at least in the SB. But then again, if it ain't broke, why fix it?

[afk]

Is anyone else strangely aroused?