|
|
#13
12-11-2005, 04:08 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Intentially Cutting Connection to go All In
It does pay to report the all-in abusers. I've done it in the past and received the usual "Yes it was suspicious, but... blah blah" However I persevered and finally, today - SUCCESS!
"Thank you for taking the time to report a potentially suspect usage of the *disconnect protect* feature. We have thoroughly investigated *xxxxxx* account history with a particular focus on their previous usage of this feature. We have found that the hand you reported to us was indeed suspicious and as the investigation has revealed further suspicious disconnects in the past, we have proceeded to block the protection feature for this player. In future, should they disconnect their hand will be folded. The player concerned has been sent an email explaining the reason for our actions. If you need any further clarification, please do not hesitate to contact us. Contact us anytime, we are available around the clock to assist you with your account related questions and suggestions. Sincerely, xxxxx Investigations Team" This was from Party Poker, by the way. Just write down the user name and the hand number whenever it happens and send an email after the session is over... it's well worth the 30 seconds it takes. 
|
|
#14
12-11-2005, 04:21 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Intentially Cutting Connection to go All In
[ QUOTE ]
The Pokerroom network doesn't allow all-in protection on any of its no-limit tables. I mostly play there because of this, I just find it really annoying when people disconnect at other sites. It doesn't even happen that often, maybe once every other day or so, but it's enough to keep me going back to PR. [/ QUOTE ] First, the pokerroom network sucks. second, it doesnt not happen every other day. It has been about 100,000 hands between someone pulling that crap with me. third, the pokerroom networks sucks fourt, party poker and other sites have specific tables that don't allow disconnect protect. fifth, the pokerroom netowrk sucks.
|
|
#15
12-11-2005, 05:17 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Intentially Cutting Connection to go All In
I don't really agree that Pokerroom sucks. Certainly they're not awesome or anything like that and they have problems like all networks. Still not terrible though.
Perhaps I've just been unlucky, I found disconnections occuring far too often in all-in pots on Party. Surely the no-DP protect tables are avoided by the uber-fish?
|
|
#16
12-11-2005, 08:52 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Intentially Cutting Connection to go All In
[ QUOTE ]
I don't really agree that Pokerroom sucks. Certainly they're not awesome or anything like that and they have problems like all networks. Still not terrible though. Perhaps I've just been unlucky, I found disconnections occuring far too often in all-in pots on Party. Surely the no-DP protect tables are avoided by the uber-fish? [/ QUOTE ] The "uber-fish" don't cheat, they're too dumb. DP abusers are most likely either marginal winners or marginal losers. They have a clue (its how they figured out how to exploit the cheat in the first place), but they're just not good enough to win without cheating.
|
|
#17
12-11-2005, 09:13 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Intentially Cutting Connection to go All In
I think the fish take the first table available. Personally i havent found a difference.
as for pokerroom, i have had so many problems with them and continue to do so while i finish clearing a bonus through eurobet. I obviously dont speak for everyone, but my experiences have been brutal.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
