Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Tournament Poker > Multi-table Tournaments

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-06-2005, 06:20 PM
adanthar adanthar is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 27
Default Interesting discussion in Poker Theory about tournament profitability

This thread is only partly on point but has some interesting conclusions: http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/sh...14&fpart=1

To summarize, Jackpot Jay once quoted Lee Jones as saying that only 7%-8% of online poker players end their year in the black. In most PT databases, however, around 40% of ring game players are winners (this number apparently holds up over time.) Therefore, the number of overall losers must be greatly inflated by otherwise breakeven or winning ring game players playing a losing tournament game. In fact, 'greatly' may be an understatement, because from 40% to 8% is a huge jump. [Edit: I should mention that the fact that 40% of the players are winners in PT means that the actual number is smaller, due to statistical sample size issues. Nonetheless, it is clear that the number of tournament winners is much smaller than the number of ring game winners.]

I suspect this is true mostly due to MTT's rather than SNG's (where the 109 and 215 regulars are numerous enough, and the play at the 11's is soft enough, that the 8% number probably cannot be right). A good example of why this is so is the Empire Happy Hour, which is a slightly +$EV tournament (the occasional overlays more than make up for the times they actually collect the $1) that's got more than its share of 2+2'ers. I haven't played nearly enough of them to get an accurate ROI, of course, but I have a large enough sample to know I'm a big winner in that tourney, along with 4-6 other 2+2'ers and a couple of good regulars. The other 90%+ of the field on a day to day basis, however, are clear net losers, and this is in a tournament that averages a slight overlay.

I will go on to speculate that in a normal tournament field, with 8-10% rake, less than 5% of the field are long term winners.

Discuss.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-06-2005, 06:42 PM
LearnedfromTV LearnedfromTV is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Van down by the river
Posts: 176
Default Re: Interesting discussion in Poker Theory about tournament profitability

Everything you say sounds plausible, but

I would argue that there is a big difference between saying

a. 5% of anyone who has ever played a given buyin MTT at a given site are winners

and

b. 5% of a given field are winners

I agree with a. but not b. because the winners play more often, a fact which skews this statistic (% of players who are winning) in general, but probably even more so with respect to tournaments.

I am willing to bet that a lot of bad players who just want to gamble it up every once in a while without much real risk play tournaments way more than they play ring games.

I also speculate that poker tracker databases miss a lot of one deposit and done ring game players, inflating the 40% figure more than you think.

In general, I think looking at Joe 30 hours a week Multitabler and tallying one in the winner column and then looking at a ten guys who put $20 in for the hell of it, lose a couple tourneys, never play again and tallying ten in the loss column, then saying 1 in 11 win, is a bit misleading.

In general, there are way more losers than winners in part because there are way more small losers than small winners, which is even more true in multi table tournaments than ring games or sng's.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-06-2005, 06:43 PM
EverettKings EverettKings is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Williamsburg, VA
Posts: 86
Default Re: Interesting discussion in Poker Theory about tournament profitability

I think that it's mostly explained by the payout. A lot of MTTers will lose a little, and a few will win a ton. A MTT is populated by players with a -20% ROI and players with a +200% ROI. With the top players taking so much more than the others, it doesn't leave much money to create a decent percentage of winners.

What exactly did you want to discuss?

Everett
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-06-2005, 06:48 PM
FishInAPhoneBooth FishInAPhoneBooth is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 26
Default Re: Interesting discussion in Poker Theory about tournament profitability

Thats why I am prety much exclusively playing MTT these days. As I explained to a friend, I think at least 1/2 of the people playing have no chance of ever making the $$...
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-06-2005, 08:20 PM
FakeKramer FakeKramer is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Indiana
Posts: 34
Default Re: Interesting discussion in Poker Theory about tournament profitabil

[ QUOTE ]
I think at least 1/2 of the people playing have no chance of ever making the $$...

[/ QUOTE ]There's an over-statement for you.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-06-2005, 08:25 PM
FishInAPhoneBooth FishInAPhoneBooth is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 26
Default Re: Interesting discussion in Poker Theory about tournament profitabil

Have you ever played the $1 and $5 MTT?
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10-06-2005, 08:35 PM
FakeKramer FakeKramer is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Indiana
Posts: 34
Default Re: Interesting discussion in Poker Theory about tournament profitabil

Yes. All the time. To say that 50% of the field has a 0% chance of ever finishing in the money is an absolutely ridiculous claim.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 10-06-2005, 09:38 PM
johnnybeef johnnybeef is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: its whats for dinner
Posts: 878
Default Re: Interesting discussion in Poker Theory about tournament profitabil

Most of the points that you make are due to the High variance involved with tournament poker. If we were talking about theoretical winners I'm sure the number would be much higher.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 10-06-2005, 09:39 PM
FishInAPhoneBooth FishInAPhoneBooth is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 26
Default Re: Interesting discussion in Poker Theory about tournament profitabil

Sorry I meant the money as in a payday worth playing for, not a 2% return on you buyin. Although since in $1 tournaments 2/3's the field is out by the end of the first hour it may come close.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:19 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.