Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > General Poker Discussion > Books and Publications
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #61  
Old 07-19-2005, 12:22 PM
vulturesrow vulturesrow is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 24
Default Re: why not Ed?

[ QUOTE ]
What if all those that might submit our databases to Levitt gave them to someone like Ed?

I don't know if mr. majorkong would be interested, of course. It'd have to be someone that the majority of posters here trust.

Ed just seems to be like the perfect guy because he doesn't play much online (at least I don't think so), he's respected by people here, and he's a better theorist than Levitt. heh.

Would anyone actually be interested in doing this?

[/ QUOTE ]

Id be willing to but I imagine Ed is pretty busy these days and this would be a fairly large undertaking I would think. But if another 2+2er wants to step up to the plate, Im game. However it would be somewhat of an invalid comparison if our analysis set wasnt the exact same one that the Pokernomics team is using.
Reply With Quote
  #62  
Old 07-19-2005, 01:17 PM
Ed Miller Ed Miller is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Writing \"Small Stakes Hold \'Em\"
Posts: 4,548
Default Re: why not Ed?

[ QUOTE ]
Id be willing to but I imagine Ed is pretty busy these days and this would be a fairly large undertaking I would think. But if another 2+2er wants to step up to the plate, Im game. However it would be somewhat of an invalid comparison if our analysis set wasnt the exact same one that the Pokernomics team is using.

[/ QUOTE ]

Ya, I definitely don't have time for the next six plus months to work on a project like this. And, frankly, I'm curious what Levitt will come up with on his own without "help" from us know-it-alls. [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

After he publishes a paper or two, if his results are impressive, I'd be interested to see if maybe we could direct future research to answer specific questions we want answered.
Reply With Quote
  #63  
Old 07-19-2005, 02:11 PM
dchandler321 dchandler321 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 33
Default <<REMINDER FROM POKERNOMICS TEAM>>

This is just a reminder.

The pokernomics team is open to ideas and research questions and you should feel free to send them to support@pokernomics.com.

Though we intend to do much of the initial analysis without direct consultation of the poker playing community, we are receptive to ideas. Once we've done more of our own analysis we will then look for people to discuss our findings.
Reply With Quote
  #64  
Old 07-20-2005, 09:36 AM
Matt Ruff Matt Ruff is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 75
Default Re: Been thinking about this project a lot for the past 24 hours

[ QUOTE ]
Brilliant minds have been pouring over natural language data for decades

[/ QUOTE ]

Now there's a lovely image to contemplate during breakfast.

-- M. Ruff
Reply With Quote
  #65  
Old 08-09-2005, 02:28 PM
uuDevil uuDevil is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Remembering P. Tillman
Posts: 246
Default Re: Pokernomics

[ QUOTE ]
...I look forward to seeing the results of this study. I'm also eagerly anticipating my free book.

[/ QUOTE ]

I got my free book today! [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

It was signed and came with the advice to go "All in!" Seems like odd advice to give to a limit player, but then again, I don't play all that well.... [img]/images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img]

The actual analysis results are promised for ~end of summer. Should be interesting.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:48 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.