|
|
#42
05-10-2005, 01:17 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: This Will Keep You Busy
|
|
#43
05-10-2005, 01:29 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: This Will Keep You Busy
|
|
#45
05-10-2005, 03:47 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: This Will Keep You Busy
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] I dated one of the 1998s. No lie. [/ QUOTE ] Tiffany Taylor looks kinda gross but if it was anyone other than her, then I am impressed. [/ QUOTE ] April. And it was about 6-7 years before...
|
|
#46
05-10-2005, 06:23 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: This Will Keep You Busy
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] gorie, what the hell are you talking about? [/ QUOTE ] There's some fairly lazy photoshopping in the lower pic. Look at her back. About half of the left side of the person in question disappeared. Personally, I tend to like a little more symmetry in my women [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] That said, I have no idea where the lower pic came from. [/ QUOTE ] i just found myself intrigued looking through those pictures. comparing current "sexy" to what was considered "sexy" in the past. i was curious to see what one of those pictures would look like if it was done today. since i was bored i did some (poor) retouching to bring her up to todays standards. that's where the second picture came from. i was being a bit facetious with my post. you know, that explains that ... i can't help but appreciate those older centerfolds. the more recent years look so plastic. not that they don't look good, but... anyway, my favorite is that one girl with the boobs. [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
