Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Other Topics > Politics
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 10-15-2005, 01:39 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Great or Sucks

nh
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 10-15-2005, 01:40 PM
Arnfinn Madsen Arnfinn Madsen is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 449
Default Re: Great or Sucks

[ QUOTE ]



Sucks.

[/ QUOTE ]

Interested to hear why you think so.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 10-15-2005, 01:55 PM
El Barto El Barto is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 119
Default Re: Great or Sucks

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]



Sucks.

[/ QUOTE ]

Interested to hear why you think so.

[/ QUOTE ]

Be happy everyone. Bush gets to pick someone better, and you know how good he is at picking nominees. [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 10-15-2005, 02:00 PM
Matty Matty is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 14
Default Re: Great or Sucks

Actual debate about the Supreme Court got you so frustrated that you had to run away and vent your anger with pictures and "sucks"? Does that really work?
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 10-15-2005, 02:02 PM
El Barto El Barto is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 119
Default Re: Great or Sucks

[ QUOTE ]
Actual debate about the Supreme Court got you so frustrated that you had to run away and vent your anger with pictures and "sucks"? Does that really work?

[/ QUOTE ]

After we concluded that your poll was very vague and worthless, and that you didn't understand the term "religious test" - the debate was over.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 10-15-2005, 02:03 PM
Matty Matty is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 14
Default Re: Great or Sucks

Who is this "we"?

The poll was non-existant in our discussion.

And it is you who rejects the literal definition of "religious test" for your notion of what you feel the founding fathers really meant when they wrote that- but were too stupid to put into words.

Does "religious" include only Christianity? Of course not. It includes all religions.

Does "tests" include only one kind of test? Of course not. It includes all tests. Yet this is the claim that you make- sans any evidence whatsoever.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 10-15-2005, 02:53 PM
El Barto El Barto is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 119
Default Re: Great or Sucks

Nice, I've picked up my own stalker [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]

I'm not going to do your learning for you, Grey, but here are two hints:

1-Read the entire phrase "but no religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to any office or public trust under the United States"

2-look up each word, like "required" and "qualification"

And be sure to post your reply in yet another unrelated thread, so that no one can track your previous mistakes on this issue. [img]/images/graemlins/smirk.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 10-15-2005, 02:55 PM
vulturesrow vulturesrow is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 24
Default Re: Great or Sucks

</font><blockquote><font class="small">En respuesta a:</font><hr />
Actual debate about the Supreme Court got you so frustrated that you had to run away and vent your anger with pictures and "sucks"? Does that really work?

[/ QUOTE ]

Im starting to think you take this forum a little too seriously.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 10-15-2005, 05:38 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Great or Sucks

[ QUOTE ]


Im starting to think you take this forum a little too seriously.



[/ QUOTE ]

LOL

Lot of that going on in this forum. In the interest of maybe lightening up this forum, and since this thread seems to be dying, I'd like to offer a couple of great sucks for consideration (I know, OOT material, but what tha hell)....









Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 10-15-2005, 06:12 PM
Matty Matty is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 14
Default Re: Great or Sucks

[ QUOTE ]
I'm not going to do your learning for you, Grey, but here are two hints:

1-Read the entire phrase "but no religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to any office or public trust under the United States"

2-look up each word, like "required" and "qualification"

[/ QUOTE ]Ah, now you're completely changing your argument. Nice. Are you going to ambiguously tell me to look up the word "is" next?

When President Bush took religion into consideration, he admitted that it was a required qualification to him. I've already explained this to you in the other thread, and you haven't replied to it. If no religious value whatsoever were required, you could not accurately say that religion was taken into consideration.[ QUOTE ]
And be sure to post your reply in yet another unrelated thread, so that no one can track your previous mistakes on this issue. [img]/images/graemlins/smirk.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]Please list mistakes I've made.

I've provided links in both threads to each other. Your entire argument relies on being vague, and implying there is something somewhere out there that refutes me, yet you can't tell me what it is. Do you think you can win arguments with smirky-faces? I'm not the one changing my argument whenever one gets riddled with holes.

Here's the link again.

I'd really like to see you finish a conversation for once El Barto. I really think some accountability would do you some good.

Eagerly awaiting your next vague, condescending post which avoids everything and ends in smiley faces-

-Grey
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:10 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.