Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Micro-Limits
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 06-04-2005, 08:09 PM
irishpint irishpint is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: what you want, G?
Posts: 1,249
Default Re: A hand for discussion

is it possible you're in your poker hell because you play hands this way?!
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 06-04-2005, 08:14 PM
tijean tijean is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: here, now
Posts: 1
Default Re: A hand for discussion

The only way I can see to justify this play is against someone who never folds - he plays 100% of his hands, and sees a showdown every hand - and only because MP3 didn't tag along.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 06-04-2005, 08:23 PM
detruncate detruncate is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 680
Default Re: A hand for discussion

I could see playing this way against a full-on maniac with a hand you want to show down but don't think is strong enough to justify putting in 3 bets on any street. Perhaps also against someone who will fold anything you beat but 3-bet things that beat you -- you can't fold the turn with your gutshot + ace getting 9:1 or so after he 3-bets you.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 06-04-2005, 09:22 PM
MrWookie47 MrWookie47 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: ^^ That wookie
Posts: 1,485
Default Re: A hand for discussion

You are approximately a 3:2 dog on every street against a truly random hand. If this guy is a pure maniac, 100%/100%/infinity, your play is fine. Anything less than that, though, and the chances you're way behind go up significantly.

In general, fold the flop. Barring that, fold the turn. If you still haven't folded, fold the river.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 06-05-2005, 02:20 AM
LazyRobot LazyRobot is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 15
Default Re: A hand for discussion

Jaran:

Curious to your motives now. I would not make this play on the flop personally especially with MP3s presence alone however you say you have a good reason. Anyway what were your thoughts here?
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 06-05-2005, 07:25 AM
Kevin K. Kevin K. is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: rooting for the bad guy
Posts: 247
Default Re: A hand for discussion

It's just too fancy and not profitable. I'm guessing your read is that he plays any 2. You're roughly 3-2 against random hands preflop. Then you don't hit on any street. You fall further and further behind each street.

Good read, but it's -EV.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 06-05-2005, 07:39 AM
DA MICRO MASTAH DA MICRO MASTAH is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: 8-tabling the Party 50
Posts: 19
Default Re: A hand for discussion

Jaran,
I'm going to assume you called the flop because of your backdoor draws, the turn because of your gutshot, and the river probably because "I was curious as to what cards my opponent held." Well I just want to make it known that I don't like it, no not one bit. Perhaps you have watched a few too many World Poker Tour final tables, but ace high doesn't amount to very much here in the micro limits.

It is play like THIS that eventually results in 100BB or larger downswings. Now maybe you are a rich yuppie to whom $100 means little, but at least have some respect for those of us who worked hard at Home Depot to EARN our bankrolls by not posting horribly misplayed hands like this and then playing them off as solid poker!

I guess I'll see you in hell. Poker hell.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 06-05-2005, 07:57 AM
FlopMe FlopMe is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Liberalism\'s a mental disorder
Posts: 205
Default Re: A hand for discussion

Great gimmick account. bisonbison? You're hillarious, whoever you are.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 06-05-2005, 10:53 AM
btspider btspider is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 39
Default Re: A hand for discussion

i'm assuming a maniac.

i don't think i like it. if he's a maniac, then you should have tightened up PF. I think you need more pairing value.. e.g. A7s or similar to enter this pot. your 2 sidecard, if paired, only allows you to pass better Aces.. which we obvious don't need to fear too much.

now if he'll cap every street when you have a flush.. that's another story.

a maniac gives you odds to call on the turn with your 5.5-6'ish outs, so the only other issue is whether the flop call is an implied odds call or an intent to showdown call.. in which case would a raise be better?
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 06-05-2005, 11:28 AM
aron aron is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Sweden
Posts: 233
Default Re: A hand for discussion

Am I the only one who would fold this PF?

-aron
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:07 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.