Stat line for Vick (and Clark)

[brettbrettr]

I read this moring that in his last two games, Vick's QB rating has been over 100 and the Flacons have lost both. That was a [censored] point, because the game before he had a high rating and they won. So, its last three, 1-2. However, check this out.

Rating W/L
55 W
94 L
83 W
129 L
58 W
16 W
102 W
108 L
99 L


They do better when he doesn't throw well?

[brettbrettr]

HAHAHAH.

Can someone please move this to Sports. TY,

brett

[imported_CaseClosed326]

Yeah, turns out a team need their defense to play well to win.

[RacersEdge]

[ QUOTE ]
I read this moring that in his last two games, Vick's QB rating has been over 100 and the Flacons have lost both. That was a [censored] point, because the game before he had a high rating and they won. So, its last three, 1-2. However, check this out.

Rating W/L
55 W
94 L
83 W
129 L
58 W
16 W
102 W
108 L
99 L


They do better when he doesn't throw well?

[/ QUOTE ]

I noticed that too - but that's a PASSER rating, not a QB rating. Big difference in Vick's case.

[Jack of Arcades]

I think it has something to do with the fact that when they recover 9/10 fumbles on defense and 6/9 fumbles on offense, they do well. When they recover 0 fumbles on defense and 2/7 fumbles on offense, they don't do well. Novel concept.

[RacersEdge]

Also, I am too lazy to check, but the last 3 games, the number of times they started drives inside the 20 is a huge. I would guess at least 50%. Rossum hasn't done a thing in a month - except fumble and get tackled.

[Jack of Arcades]

Vick has performed MUCH better over the last 3 weeks than he has since 2002.