#1
|
|||
|
|||
Stat line for Vick (and Clark)
I read this moring that in his last two games, Vick's QB rating has been over 100 and the Flacons have lost both. That was a [censored] point, because the game before he had a high rating and they won. So, its last three, 1-2. However, check this out.
Rating W/L 55 W 94 L 83 W 129 L 58 W 16 W 102 W 108 L 99 L They do better when he doesn't throw well? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Stat line for Vick (and Clark)
HAHAHAH.
Can someone please move this to Sports. TY, brett |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Stat line for Vick (and Clark)
Yeah, turns out a team need their defense to play well to win.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Stat line for Vick (and Clark)
[ QUOTE ]
I read this moring that in his last two games, Vick's QB rating has been over 100 and the Flacons have lost both. That was a [censored] point, because the game before he had a high rating and they won. So, its last three, 1-2. However, check this out. Rating W/L 55 W 94 L 83 W 129 L 58 W 16 W 102 W 108 L 99 L They do better when he doesn't throw well? [/ QUOTE ] I noticed that too - but that's a PASSER rating, not a QB rating. Big difference in Vick's case. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Stat line for Vick (and Clark)
I think it has something to do with the fact that when they recover 9/10 fumbles on defense and 6/9 fumbles on offense, they do well. When they recover 0 fumbles on defense and 2/7 fumbles on offense, they don't do well. Novel concept.
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Stat line for Vick (and Clark)
Also, I am too lazy to check, but the last 3 games, the number of times they started drives inside the 20 is a huge. I would guess at least 50%. Rossum hasn't done a thing in a month - except fumble and get tackled.
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Stat line for Vick (and Clark)
Vick has performed MUCH better over the last 3 weeks than he has since 2002.
|
|
|