Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Small Stakes Hold'em
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 11-16-2005, 10:49 PM
flair1239 flair1239 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 343
Default Re: AK0 between two very interested TAGS

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
but you are in a raise or fold situation

[/ QUOTE ]

Why?

[/ QUOTE ]

Yeah... why?
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 11-16-2005, 10:55 PM
flair1239 flair1239 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 343
Default Re: AK0 between two very interested TAGS

[ QUOTE ]
These are good TAGs. If they're waiting to the turn to raise, it means my overs aren't worth chit.

[/ QUOTE ]

Brett,

QQ, JJ, or TT may all elect to wait till the turn to go to war on this flop.

waiting to see if a over or a diamond hits.

At least I would. But I am just a TAG. Maybe some of the "good" TAGs can chime in
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 11-16-2005, 10:58 PM
McGahee McGahee is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 735
Default Re: AK0 between two very interested TAGS

I'm having a hell of a time putting BB on a hand here - maybe he's a better player than me because I can't really think of anything I'd play this way outside of maybe KQ [img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] and even then I don't know if I risk folding one opponent and getting into a raising war with the other with probable dirty OC outs.
I'm pretty sure I hate raising in this spot because I don't think you're pushing CO off of anything but maybe AK after he 3-bets PF and you don't cap. In the heat of battle I probably call but I also think I peel too much.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 11-16-2005, 11:11 PM
brettbrettr brettbrettr is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 1
Default Re: AK0 between two very interested TAGS

Good point, Flair.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 11-16-2005, 11:17 PM
flair1239 flair1239 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 343
Default Re: AK0 between two very interested TAGS

BTW, I favor folding here.

Too likely that the turn card that would give you your flush draw would also either complete a full house, make another flush that would make you pay through the nose to draw, and again further possible redraws by the other players (I am assuming (1) high pocket pair in the hand.

Coupled with the very real possibility that you are already close to dead against AA. or the slimmer possibility the flop bettor actually hit the lottery.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 11-16-2005, 11:28 PM
Carmine Carmine is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 36
Default Re: AK0 between two very interested TAGS

I'm concerned about a "good tag" that just calls a 3-bet PF (granted he will be oop for the hand)and then has perfect position to protect with a check-raise, but opts to lead. How likely is AA/KK here.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 11-16-2005, 11:31 PM
brettbrettr brettbrettr is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 1
Default Re: AK0 between two very interested TAGS

[ QUOTE ]
I'm concerned about a "good tag" that just calls a 3-bet PF (granted he will be oop for the hand)and then has perfect position to protect with a check-raise, but opts to lead. How likely is AA/KK here.

[/ QUOTE ]

I'm not sure it all that likely. But 88-JJ seem well within his range.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 11-16-2005, 11:38 PM
Carmine Carmine is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 36
Default Re: AK0 between two very interested TAGS

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I'm concerned about a "good tag" that just calls a 3-bet PF (granted he will be oop for the hand)and then has perfect position to protect with a check-raise, but opts to lead. How likely is AA/KK here.

[/ QUOTE ]

I'm not sure it all that likely. But 88-JJ seem well within his range.

[/ QUOTE ]

TT/JJ was my first thought judging by PF. I'm thinking he might fold less considering the opposition and would cap more. It's the flop that confuses me because I feel TT/JJ would check-raise to try and push out hero.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 11-17-2005, 11:30 AM
brettbrettr brettbrettr is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 1
Default bumping the raise or fold discussion

n/m
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:34 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.