Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Medium Stakes Hold'em

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-04-2005, 12:50 PM
Dazarath Dazarath is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 185
Default Preflop question - AQo

In HEFAP, Sklansky advocates not raising hands like AQo/AJo
after a few limpers, instead, calling to see a flop and then playing once you have a made hand. On the 2+2 forums, the accepted philosophy is to pump equity edges anytime you have one, foregoing some of the potential to force opponents into postflop mistakes.

I decided to play around a little with PokerStove and here are some numbers I got:
(Green means that AQo has an equity edge, whereas red means the hand does not.)
- I define playable (loose) hands as:
22+,A2s+,K2s+,Q8s+,J8s+,T8s+,97s+,86s+,75s+,64s+,5 3s+,42s+,32s,A2o+,KTo+,QTo+,JTo
- I define playable (tight) hands as:
22+,A2s+,K9s+,Q9s+,J9s+,T8s+,97s+,86s+,75s+,64s+,5 4s,ATo+,KTo+,QTo+,JTo
- I define playing (non-raising) hands as:
99-22,A9s-A2s,K9s+,Q9s+,J9s+,T8s+,97s+,86s+,75s+,64s+,54s,KT o+,QTo+,JTo
- PokerStove defines the top 30% of hands as:
55+,A2s+,K5s+,Q7s+,J8s+,T8s+,98s,A7o+,A5o,K9o+,Q9o +,J9o+,T9o

AQo vs 9 random hands - <font color="green">15.4%</font>
AQo vs 9 playable (loose) hands - <font color="red">7.8%</font>
AQo vs 5 playable (loose) hands - <font color="green">17.1%</font>
AQo vs 3 playable (loose) hands - <font color="green">28.8%</font>
AQo vs 5 playable (tight) hands - <font color="red">16.0%</font>
AQo vs 3 playable (tight) hands - <font color="green">27.0%</font>
AQo vs 9 playable (non-raising) hands - <font color="black">10.0%</font>
AQo vs 5 playable (non-raising) hands - <font color="green">20.5%</font>
AQo vs 3 playable (non-raising) hands - <font color="green">31.7%</font>
AQo vs 9 hands from the top 30% - <font color="red">8.2%</font>
AQo vs 5 hands from the top 30% - <font color="green">18.3%</font>
AQo vs 3 hands from the top 30% - <font color="green">30.2%</font>

I picked AQo as a hand, because I find it to be a marginal hand that 2+2ers advocate raising after many limpers. As for the hand ranges, I picked the playable (loose) range, just judging by the average casino goer who's not a complete donk. I would say most of these players are too loose, but they usually don't showdown 83o at the end. I picked playable (tight) and playable (non-raising) just based on my judgment. I used a tighter range for a situation where you're raising AQo after players who have a tighter range. Lastly, I used a sort of "non-raising" range, because chances are if you're raising a field of limpers with AQo, they aren't holding hands like AA or AK.

I won't get into details for every test, but basically, if your opponents have any half-decent idea of hand selection, AQo's equity decreases drastically as the number of opponents increases.

Just a couple notes:
1) I know PokerStove analysis doesn't tell us everything. I does do well as a base point or an estimate. The final decision should be made using one's own judgment, of course.
2) The numbers probably have an error of +/- 0.2%, because I didn't feel like running the trials for half an hour each.
3) The hand ranges are not always correct. This should be obvious. Again, this is just to get a feel for the numbers, not an end-all solution.

Because the rake takes out a portion of the pot, your edge needs to be greater than 1/(number of players) * 100% + x%. I'm not sure what this x% is, but I wouldn't advocate pumping the pot preflop when you feel you have a 0.1% equity edge, as there's no gain. Plus, the potential postflop edge is worth so much more at that point. I'm wondering what this x% is.

The point of this thread was basically to discuss the idea of raising hands after multiple limpers, and where the cutoffs should be. I've seen a thread where someone advocated raising AQo in the BB after the whole table limps. I won't say that it's wrong or right, but it seems to be that if your opponents don't all have 50+% VPIP, you're pushing a small (more likely negative edge) and you're giving up the potential to make chasers screw up later.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:41 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, vBulletin Solutions Inc.