Party Poker Vs. PokerStars

[RYL]

I got two questions.
Which one do you currently play on?
If you tried both which one do you prefer?

I'm currently playing on PokerStars.
I didn't try Party Poker, but I'm planning on signing up real soon.

[Eihli]

Partypoker.
Partypoker.

[roundhouse]

Started playing on pstars, liked the interface, saw everone posting here screaming on about party so switched there, liked the games, and the bonuses (and the fact you can look up the HH easily to see mucked cards). May switch to Empire sometime soon (to get some rake back).

RH

[skcubrats]

Both.
Stars has the better software and but Party has more of certain games that I like to play.

[LinusKS]

Party has worse players and worse software - except you can get instant hand histories, which is niice.

Right now I'm playing PS, because they have cheaper fees for the games I play, and because I'm not getting a rakeback on Party.

[RYL]

nice... I guess I should sign up for both party and empire.

[Airpoaneman]

I like that, I like that, Its where they money's at.

[sammy_g]

Play Party for ring games and Stars for tournaments. The Party ring games are much, much softer than those at Stars.

[BigBaitsim (milo)]

Party, party, party.

[rdu $teve]

[ QUOTE ]
Play Party for ring games and Stars for tournaments. The Party ring games are much, much softer than those at Stars.

[/ QUOTE ]

exactly what I was going to say. Party ring games are loaded with fish. Pokerstars has a better tourney structure.