|
|
#11
11-29-2005, 08:53 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: The Peter Rus rule
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] T2s-T6s, 92s-96s, 82s-85s, 72s-75s, 62s-64s, 52s-54s, 42s-43s, 32s. 3 players seeing a flop, in the big blind, put money in (VPIPed) [/ QUOTE ] Doesn't PT count hands where you post in late position as being the big blind? [/ QUOTE ] i have no idea...if this is true, then i cant imagine much of a difference, because i rarely post in the CO [/ QUOTE ] really? why not? i thought there was little debate as to whether or not posting in the CO was profitable. 
|
|
#12
11-29-2005, 09:07 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: The Peter Rus rule
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] T2s-T6s, 92s-96s, 82s-85s, 72s-75s, 62s-64s, 52s-54s, 42s-43s, 32s. 3 players seeing a flop, in the big blind, put money in (VPIPed) [/ QUOTE ] Doesn't PT count hands where you post in late position as being the big blind? [/ QUOTE ] i have no idea...if this is true, then i cant imagine much of a difference, because i rarely post in the CO [/ QUOTE ] really? why not? i thought there was little debate as to whether or not posting in the CO was profitable. [/ QUOTE ] i always forget to post when i first sit and by the time i realize i should post im in mp..althought recently ive been posting more...thing is i mostly play short handed so its usually not much more profitable...probably even EV
|
|
#13
11-29-2005, 09:20 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: The Peter Rus rule
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] T2s-T6s, 92s-96s, 82s-85s, 72s-75s, 62s-64s, 52s-54s, 42s-43s, 32s. 3 players seeing a flop, in the big blind, put money in (VPIPed) [/ QUOTE ] Doesn't PT count hands where you post in late position as being the big blind? [/ QUOTE ] i have no idea...if this is true, then i cant imagine much of a difference, because i rarely post in the CO [/ QUOTE ] really? why not? i thought there was little debate as to whether or not posting in the CO was profitable. [/ QUOTE ] i always forget to post when i first sit and by the time i realize i should post im in mp..althought recently ive been posting more...thing is i mostly play short handed so its usually not much more profitable...probably even EV [/ QUOTE ] Fair enough. I've been 8tabling party full games lately, I forgot you could play poker with less than ten people.
|
|
#14
11-29-2005, 11:35 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: The Peter Rus rule
Thanks for posting this. I'm actually tired to clarify everywhere about this stuff. I'm smiling occasionally when finding some posts in small stakes looking like "Pretend to be Peter_rus - Defending with suited trash 3-way". People just missing rake structure there which force a lot of defending hands to wipe. I really don't know why calling suited trash 3-way-rule becomes so popular and always associated with my name. There are a lot more interesting things in TH, which i posted but people like this "rule" more. Just examining PT and find out how are you running in certain spots is easy and doesn't make much sense.
Currently,I use to muck many suited trash below J's in not stealing situations. Also quality of games and level of players is now higher that i faced at old 15/30 so i can't make such good profitability i got earlier, though i'm still defending a lot.
|
|
#16
11-30-2005, 12:51 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: The Peter Rus rule
[ QUOTE ]
"There is a Sklansky thread where he advocates the same thing with 73s." Wasn't the 7-3s thread from the small blind for one more chip? [/ QUOTE ] I don't think so. He advocates calling all SBs for 1 chip, except for metagame considerations. The 73s hand is if an expert UTG raises and one decent player calls, you should call in the BB. I think. Josh
|
|
#18
11-30-2005, 04:23 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: PS
[ QUOTE ]
Where are you a moderator? [/ QUOTE ] Politics forum.
|
|
#19
12-01-2005, 05:25 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: The Peter Rus rule
[ QUOTE ]
one last filter from the thread, suited trash ( T2s 92s 82s 72s T3s 93s 83s 73s T4s 94s 84s ) 3-way: 109 hands, -0.62bb/h 4+-way: 116 hands, -0.35bb/h [/ QUOTE ] Could we modify the rule to be almost always true by saying if there's a raiser and two cold callers you should call with any 2 suited cards in the big blind?
|
|
#20
12-01-2005, 05:47 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: The Peter Rus rule
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] one last filter from the thread, suited trash ( T2s 92s 82s 72s T3s 93s 83s 73s T4s 94s 84s ) 3-way: 109 hands, -0.62bb/h 4+-way: 116 hands, -0.35bb/h [/ QUOTE ] Could we modify the rule to be almost always true by saying if there's a raiser and two cold callers you should call with any 2 suited cards in the big blind? [/ QUOTE ] i just filtered for the same hands and got 180 instances, (.14) bb/hand, 3 ppl to the flop.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
