Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Tournament Poker > Multi-table Tournaments
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 08-29-2005, 06:07 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Do I suck? Legends hands

[ QUOTE ]
Unfortunately, sometimes playing a hand correctly loses you more than if you make a mistake.


[/ QUOTE ]

Simple is beautiful!

What a seemingly simple, yet so very insightful comment!
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 08-29-2005, 08:32 PM
Seadood228 Seadood228 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 5
Default Re: Do I suck? Legends hands

Against an unknown I'd probably check the turn in hand 1. The T on the turn gives him a great opportunity to represent trips if he has a flush draw. If he's on a draw, he'll likely call a large turn bet so I really don't see a point in charging him to draw and playing a big pot in a speculative situation this early.

If you check the turn, it looks like you have AK and your opponent will probably lead big on the river with a busted FD, and lead small with trips (maybe even check).

As it played out I'd still bet the river and fold to a checkraise.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 08-29-2005, 08:43 PM
CardSharpCook CardSharpCook is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: South of Heaven
Posts: 746
Default Re: Do I suck? Legends hands

Illegit, 22-99, JJ-KK, second button, 3rd button are all possible. In fact, all are more likely considering that he did not raise the turn AND checked the river out of position AND two of the four tens are accounted for. Players often (and correctly) will call down here with 2nd or 3rd button. Why? because they put you un AK, KQ, etc. These are the value bets you should be making, and you shouldn't think twice about it.

CSC
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 08-30-2005, 01:36 AM
illegit illegit is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 217
Default Re: Do I suck? Legends hands

Just because those hands are possible holdings doesn't make them equally likely with other holdings, and therefore a value bet is certainly not clear in this spot as all other holdings that beat you or will fold are all much more likely given how the hand was played. For example KK-JJ are much less likely than say 2 clubs given how passive the hand was played i.e. with an overpair he likely would have bet or raised at some point in the hand.

A TX hand is mathematically less likely than normal due to less combinations (keeping in mind pocket pairs have fewer combinations that make them up in the first place than unpaired ten-X hands, and pocket pairs are entirely what your range of calling-that-we-beat hands consist of) but more likely given how the hand was played. I'd say TX is, for example 4x more likely than KK easily in this spot, just to compare 2 possible holdings. I'd say clubs are about 5x more likely than KK, QQ or JJ for another example. If you completely ignore the betting on the hand then in general, yes you should often bet AA on a TTXXX board on the river for value. not here though, and you're losing money if you do. 100% -EV bet.

Conservative estimations. Busted club draw 40% of the time. Trip tens 35%. Set 10%. Some holding that we beat but will likely fold to a value bet 7.5%. Some other holding that we can beat AND will call 7.5%. The results of an EV calc should be obvious: a bet is unquestionably terrible.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:54 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.