Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Internet Gambling > Internet Gambling
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

View Poll Results: When will poker no longer be broadcast as prime time television?
Never 33 21.85%
10 or more years 9 5.96%
5 to 10 years 18 11.92%
3 to 5 years 58 38.41%
1 to 2 years 33 21.85%
Voters: 151. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 11-22-2005, 02:34 PM
memphis57 memphis57 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 376
Default Re: Poll Analysis

[ QUOTE ]
The fact remains that these Pac players are playing unsound poker in the extreme and it's not trickling down to my BR. The why of it is not important.

I have a similar B&M analog. This card room was action-packed with quite a lot of live players but my win rate never got much above 1 SB/hr at 10-20. After careful analysis I found my strategy lacking for the game AND the fish were not nearly as fishy as I first thought. There were a lot of smart LAGs and I was unsued to their game.

This is not the case at low limit Pac Poker. They are awful, loose morons playing junk, cold calling 3 bets and stumbling their way to the river. And they aren't dumping their chips to me.

[/ QUOTE ]

Well, certainly, if it's not profitable for you, then you shouldn't play it. And even if it is theoretically beatable, maybe it doesn't pay enough to change your style just for that game if it might interfere with your other play.

But I think "the why of it" IS important, at least for others of us who are reading your post and trying to draw conclusions for ourselves. The reason I think the why is important is that we've all found cases where stats can be distorted, even over 10K or 20K or more hands, especially when the stat we're looking at is win rate. If there aren't valid reasons to support a win rate observation, then I would be very cautious about drawing conclusions from it.

The way you describe the game - "...at low limit Pac Poker...They are awful, loose morons playing junk, cold calling 3 bets and stumbling their way to the river..." - sure sounds like it should be beatable with solid, conservative TAG play. Variance is going to be high with that kind of play, so again I wouldn't put too much faith in any short- or medium-term win rate figures, but just the nature of the play sounds like an opportunity.

I had actually quit playing Pac about 6 months ago because I thought their software was contributing to crash problems I was having. But I've bought a new computer since then, so for myself, I think I'll go back to including one Pac game to my play.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 11-23-2005, 07:01 PM
siccjay siccjay is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Louisville KY
Posts: 210
Default Re: Poll Analysis

[ QUOTE ]
Good looking games will not keep my business, I need to book winners as well.

[/ QUOTE ]

Try a new game then.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 11-23-2005, 07:54 PM
tdarko tdarko is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: watching channel 9
Posts: 824
Default Re: Pacific Results

it's a terrible site and shouldn't be anyone's "home" but i have to say that the 10K/15K/50K MTT's there are so soft that i don't know how you couldn't play them. i keep some money there just to play the 10K and 15K offered all day long and the 50K on sunday, not saying they have the best MTT structure around but i like them enough to keep a little money there to play sometimes.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:04 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.