|
|
#21
08-20-2005, 01:18 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Hijack alert...
On a total tangent here, have the restricted tables made the 30 game tougher? How does it play compared to the 20-40? I hear the consensus is that 1.5 BB/100 is on the high end of what most multi-tablers expect to make, surely a better WR is attainble in the 20 game?
|
|
#22
08-20-2005, 01:22 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Hijack alert...
[ QUOTE ]
On a total tangent here, have the restricted tables made the 30 game tougher? How does it play compared to the 20-40? I hear the consensus is that 1.5 BB/100 is on the high end of what most multi-tablers expect to make, surely a better WR is attainble in the 20 game? [/ QUOTE ] among what group is that consensus drawn. -Barron
|
|
#24
08-20-2005, 01:28 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Hijack alert...
[ QUOTE ]
There was big thread about it by Nightwish a while ago, and that's what i took out of it. But i'm asking Barron, not telling, so if you have a different take i want to hear it. Gabe [/ QUOTE ] 1.5bb+/100 is clearly doable over 100k hands. -Barron
|
|
#25
08-20-2005, 01:52 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Hijack alert...
[ QUOTE ]
On a total tangent here, have the restricted tables made the 30 game tougher? How does it play compared to the 20-40? I hear the consensus is that 1.5 BB/100 is on the high end of what most multi-tablers expect to make, surely a better WR is attainble in the 20 game? [/ QUOTE ] I think restricting the game has made the game much tougher. I hope some of the 30->20 SHed players jump in with a response to you Gabe, because I am curious. Nigel
|
|
#26
08-20-2005, 01:59 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Hijack alert...
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] On a total tangent here, have the restricted tables made the 30 game tougher? How does it play compared to the 20-40? I hear the consensus is that 1.5 BB/100 is on the high end of what most multi-tablers expect to make, surely a better WR is attainble in the 20 game? [/ QUOTE ] I think restricting the game has made the game much tougher. I hope some of the 30->20 SHed players jump in with a response to you Gabe, because I am curious. Nigel [/ QUOTE ] with good table selection and attentive play 1.5bb/100 is very attaintable. -Barron
|
|
#27
08-20-2005, 02:16 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Hijack alert...
Barron,
I don't disagree... yet, but I think before they restricted to 25 that closer to 3BB/100 might have been doable. I think table selection is much, much harder now, and it is not uncommon to have 8/10 people at the table as winning 2+2ers. It does not leave much room for the 30/10 "fish"'s money to be spread around. I'm not saying great 30 tables don't still pop-up. But before the restriction I could almost always find 4 good tables to play. Now it is not uncommon for me to just opt not to play at certain times. Nigel
|
|
#28
08-20-2005, 02:16 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 30/60 yearly income
[ QUOTE ]
You 8 table 30/60, 40 hrs a week, for a year [/ QUOTE ] You would be in a padded cell before long before the end of the year.
|
|
#29
08-20-2005, 02:21 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Hijack alert...
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] On a total tangent here, have the restricted tables made the 30 game tougher? How does it play compared to the 20-40? I hear the consensus is that 1.5 BB/100 is on the high end of what most multi-tablers expect to make, surely a better WR is attainble in the 20 game? [/ QUOTE ] I think restricting the game has made the game much tougher. I hope some of the 30->20 SHed players jump in with a response to you Gabe, because I am curious. Nigel [/ QUOTE ] with good table selection and attentive play 1.5bb/100 is very attaintable. -Barron [/ QUOTE ] I agree with this. Table selection being the key. I multi-table the party 30-60 game somewhere around 20 hours per week. I have enough trouble forcing myself to get in these hands. I must admit its partially because I like playing high stakes NL holdem/ pot limit omaha olot these days. These numbers are attainable, but not fun at all, look more on the order of 300k a year, and you will find where alot of us multitabling 30-60 college students are.
|
|
#30
08-20-2005, 02:46 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 30/60 yearly income
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] You 8 table 30/60, 40 hrs a week, for a year [/ QUOTE ] You would be in a padded cell before long before the end of the year. [/ QUOTE ] ive 8-12 tabled sngs for the last 6 months 50 hours a week.. not really that bad when you are making good money.. holla
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
