6 or 10 seat table. which do you prefer and why?

[Dbldaggers]

After talking with many players, most seem to have a real preference for either a 6 seat or a 10 seat table.

Which do you prefer and why?

DD

[TheMetetron]

6 handed.

More profitable, more hands, LAGing it up is fun, and generally it feels like I am learning and improving my game at a faster rate playing 6max.

[Lurker4]

for now at least, 6 handed...more fun and profitable, can take advantage better of bad players, and many SH skills apply to playing full. The swings suck though.

[NDHand]

10-seated, simply because it's more profitable to 8-table fullring than 4-table 6max and i'm not good enough to constantly make good marginal decisions if I 8-table 6max. Since i'm usually pretty risk adverse, playing fullring allows me to avoid a lot of marginal situations simply by being tight pre-flop, a luxury you don't really have at 6-max.

[A_Junglen]

6 handed for hold'em, 10 handed for omaha 8OB. (both limit) Although I'd play at either types..just depends on how weak the play of the table is.

[Python49]

6 max because im in position more.

[sthief09]

there are 3 numbers between 4 and 8

[Supern]

1. What is the highest level that can be played while 8-tabling?

2. And how do you play TPNK (A4) from BB against 4 players on the flop? Do you usually fold these kind of hands?

3. Do you ever play the players?

4. Do you have two monitors?

[csuf_gambler]

10 handed cause i don't know how to play 6max

[Dbldaggers]

I personally prefer 6 seat tables.


I find it easier to keep track of people's style of play that way when I multi table in nl.

DD