Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Tournament Poker > Multi-table Tournaments
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #41  
Old 10-05-2005, 04:20 PM
MLG MLG is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Cards Happen
Posts: 727
Default All the Debate Proves the Point

You can't fold AK here. Might you be up against KQ sure. Might you be up a set of x, sure. Might you be up against J10, or J10 of spades, or A10 of spades or QJ of spades, yup. AK just plays to well against that range to fold.
Reply With Quote
  #42  
Old 10-05-2005, 04:21 PM
locutus2002 locutus2002 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 469
Default Re: interesting WPT tournament hand

I don't like hero's line.

If he intends to check the turn if called then hero should bet less. If he intends to lead the turn then maybe bet more.

He should bet less because he has already anounced a big hand, and should try and keep the pot small.
Reply With Quote
  #43  
Old 10-05-2005, 04:24 PM
locutus2002 locutus2002 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 469
Default Re: interesting WPT tournament hand

Yes.
It also depends on the pro and his read of villain.
Reply With Quote
  #44  
Old 10-05-2005, 04:28 PM
SossMan SossMan is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 559
Default Re: interesting WPT tournament hand

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Maybe,

a pocket pair still has outs for starters.

This hand is about fold equity against a tight player. I have no idea what villain's capabilities are here but hero has backed away from the hand (after leading the flop), and villain doesn't need a hand to represent KQ or (55). Hero is probably uncomfortable for having missed the opportunity to raise BTF. Essentially I think the possibility of the Harrington 10% is not out of the question.

[/ QUOTE ]

You honestly think the villain called with say... 99? There is really no logic behind your reasoning, you are just saying its possible. I can't honestly beleive the villain would call with junk with 4 people behind him, with the intention of blowing the internet donk off of tptk on a blank turn.

[/ QUOTE ]

the fact that people are saying that you should fold AK leads me to think that a garbage hand / superdraw is possible. I didn't say that the hero had a internet donkey read. Just that he hadn't played very many hands and possibly had a weaktight image to the pro. Probably the pro could tell that it was his first big tourney and he didn't want to go home just yet.
Reply With Quote
  #45  
Old 10-05-2005, 04:28 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: All the Debate Proves the Point

[ QUOTE ]
All the debate proves the point that this would be a great bluff if it

1) was against an opponent who looks to know what he's doing,

2) wasn't after a weird preflop situation that may very well have given your opponent tunnel vision, and

3) didn't require calling on the flop with 2^20 people behind.


[/ QUOTE ]

If pro's bluffing here, he plays bad poker, IHMO.
Reply With Quote
  #46  
Old 10-05-2005, 04:30 PM
SossMan SossMan is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 559
Default Re: interesting WPT tournament hand

Pro was Joe Cassidy.

Hero was our own Double Eagle.

DE tanked for 3 minutes and finally decided that this was his hand and pushed. Cassidy reluctantly called.

DE said, "KQ?"
JC said, "nope" and flipped over KJ.

AK holds up.
Reply With Quote
  #47  
Old 10-05-2005, 04:32 PM
SossMan SossMan is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 559
Default Re: All the Debate Proves the Point

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
All the debate proves the point that this would be a great bluff if it

1) was against an opponent who looks to know what he's doing,

2) wasn't after a weird preflop situation that may very well have given your opponent tunnel vision, and

3) didn't require calling on the flop with 2^20 people behind.


[/ QUOTE ]

If pro's bluffing here, he plays bad poker, IHMO.

[/ QUOTE ]

it should be noted that the blinds checked, so he only has two players who haven't acted on the flop.
Reply With Quote
  #48  
Old 10-05-2005, 04:32 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: interesting WPT tournament hand

[ QUOTE ]
Pro was Joe Cassidy.

Hero was our own Double Eagle.

DE tanked for 3 minutes and finally decided that this was his hand and pushed. Cassidy reluctantly called.

DE said, "KQ?"
JC said, "nope" and flipped over KJ.

AK holds up.

[/ QUOTE ]

I think pro played horribly.
Reply With Quote
  #49  
Old 10-05-2005, 04:33 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: All the Debate Proves the Point

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
All the debate proves the point that this would be a great bluff if it

1) was against an opponent who looks to know what he's doing,

2) wasn't after a weird preflop situation that may very well have given your opponent tunnel vision, and

3) didn't require calling on the flop with 2^20 people behind.


[/ QUOTE ]

If pro's bluffing here, he plays bad poker, IHMO.

[/ QUOTE ]

it should be noted that the blinds checked, so he only has two players who haven't acted on the flop.

[/ QUOTE ]

What % of time does hero check this flop? Everyone has position on hero.
Reply With Quote
  #50  
Old 10-05-2005, 04:33 PM
SossMan SossMan is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 559
Default Re: interesting WPT tournament hand

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Pro was Joe Cassidy.

Hero was our own Double Eagle.

DE tanked for 3 minutes and finally decided that this was his hand and pushed. Cassidy reluctantly called.

DE said, "KQ?"
JC said, "nope" and flipped over KJ.

AK holds up.

[/ QUOTE ]

I think pro played horribly.

[/ QUOTE ]

i agree.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:34 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.