Daniel Negreanu offers you this......

zuluking · #1 07-23-2005, 07:00 PM

Daniel Negreanu offers to play you HU for 100K, but he'll give you odds on your money because he's confident that he outclasses you (which he does of course). He offers X on your money. In other words, if X was 2-1, and you bet $100, he'd have to call with $200. What is X for you to take this deal and play him?

RodSerling · #2 07-23-2005, 07:02 PM

Some guy on Negreanu's site kept challenging him to heads up for 47.50. They kept deleting the threads. I hope that anwsers your question, gorgeous

zuluking · #3 07-23-2005, 07:04 PM

[ QUOTE ]
Some guy on Negreanu's site kept challenging him to heads up for 47.50. They kept deleting the threads. I hope that anwsers your question, gorgeous

[/ QUOTE ]

Its just a Poker Theory question, beautiful

RodSerling · #4 07-23-2005, 07:05 PM

I know! I was just being silly, candy pants.

felson · #5 07-23-2005, 07:35 PM

you need to specify how big the blinds are.

Rudbaeck · #6 07-23-2005, 08:27 PM

I'd take it at 3:2 if we played limit. I doubt he'd give such good odds though.

RodSerling · #7 07-23-2005, 10:20 PM

on a side note: i think he should take that 47.50 guy up. Would be hilarious to see that donk lose his money

zuluking · #8 07-24-2005, 12:09 AM

[ QUOTE ]
I'd take it at 3:2 if we played limit. I doubt he'd give such good odds though.

[/ QUOTE ]

Of course he wouldn't, again, just a theory question.

Assume its NL and the blinds are 500/1000. I would also want 3-2 odds. I would hope that I could beat him 41 times out of 100.

wonkadaddy · #9 07-24-2005, 11:30 PM

assuming the blinds were that high i'd take him on at 1.3:1 and a pair of underwear (as i'd prob. wet myself playing for those stakes)

JC_Saves · #10 07-24-2005, 11:50 PM

he couldn't do that, because there is always a chance to lose, always.

Doyle Brunson said it best when he said ametuer players are the hardest for him to go against because of their unpredictability.