Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Other Topics > Sporting Events
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-06-2005, 11:26 AM
Pudge714 Pudge714 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 58
Default Babcock / Isiah

Similarly to the Martz Tice thread are Rob Babcock and Isiah Thomas trying to see who can be a worse GM. In this offseason they have made three of the worst moves in recent memory.

1. Babcock drafting Villaneuva
2. Isiah not using the Allan Houston rule for Allan Houston
3. Isiah trading so much for Eddy Curry even though he has a heart condidtion and may never play another NBA game.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-06-2005, 11:34 AM
brettbrettr brettbrettr is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 1
Default Re: Babcock / Isiah

FWIW I read that Isaih wasn't allowed to release Houston b/c of Houston's relationship with the Dolans. He's certainly horrible, but I'm not sure the fault for this one falls squarely at his feet.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-06-2005, 11:40 AM
xadrez xadrez is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: the island of dr. klahn
Posts: 303
Default Re: Babcock / Isiah

This is true. Dolan has a man-crush on Allan Houston.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-06-2005, 11:39 AM
xadrez xadrez is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: the island of dr. klahn
Posts: 303
Default Re: Babcock / Isiah

How did Isiah trade "so much"? He gave up a solid, yet undersized role player with no upside in Sweetney, en expiring contract, and 1 first rounder. How is this too much. If anything, Paxson should be worried that Curry heart is fine, since he got so little for a potential impact player.

Isiah is gambling that is undeniable. But what he gave up is the issue here.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-06-2005, 12:12 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Babcock / Isiah

[ QUOTE ]
How did Isiah trade "so much"? He gave up a solid, yet undersized role player with no upside in Sweetney, en expiring contract, and 1 first rounder. How is this too much. If anything, Paxson should be worried that Curry heart is fine, since he got so little for a potential impact player.

Isiah is gambling that is undeniable. But what he gave up is the issue here.

[/ QUOTE ]

I agree with this. Legitimate centers who can play are a rarity in the eastern conference. He got one who is 22 years old, with a few years in the league already, not only without giving up a front line player but getting rid of the unplayable Tim Thomas. Sure Curry has warts, but it's not unreasonable to think that Larry Brown can correct many of them and that the player is young enough to still be able to mature. And with regard to the medical issues -- Curry had to pass a physical before the trade would be official.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-06-2005, 08:21 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Babcock / Isiah

This trade by itself isnt that bad for the Knicks, although Isiah obviously is takin a big risk. The biggest problem with this trade is that it hurts New Yorks already horrible cap situation. In 2007 Lebron becomes a free agent and you can be sure that his sponsors will want him in New York, and that he will want to be in New York because he will get paid even more by his sponsors. In the NBA, a team can not sign a free agent from another team if they are over the cap, except for the mid-level exemption. Therefore the Knicks, who were already in a monster hole as it was are now even worse off, plus they traded their only bit of cap relief- Tim Thomas.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10-06-2005, 10:37 PM
Huskiez Huskiez is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: New York
Posts: 230
Default Re: Babcock / Isiah

[ QUOTE ]
Therefore the Knicks, who were already in a monster hole as it was are now even worse off, plus they traded their only bit of cap relief- Tim Thomas.

[/ QUOTE ]

Nah, they got back Antonio Davis, who makes about as much, and comes off the books this year. So does Penny.

I think this Curry signing might put them over the cap in 2007 though.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 10-06-2005, 11:02 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Babcock / Isiah

the trade overall hurt their cap immensely because thomas contract>davis contract plus they got curry. Even if they hadnt done the trade they would still have had trouble clearing enough room for 07, now they have no chance.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 10-06-2005, 11:40 AM
IndieMatty IndieMatty is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Losing 4/8 Stud Player
Posts: 365
Default Re: Babcock / Isiah

Isiah > Layden

Babcocks Villenueva pick was probably the worst draft pick since Frederick Weiss.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 10-06-2005, 11:44 AM
xadrez xadrez is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: the island of dr. klahn
Posts: 303
Default Re: Babcock / Isiah

Dont forget that last year, with the same pick, Babcock took Rafael Araujo . WTF! At least Villanueva has some potential.

Edit:fixed
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:58 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.