Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Small Stakes Shorthanded
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-19-2005, 03:01 AM
StellarWind StellarWind is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 704
Default SB defense standards

When I loosened up my preflop standards recently I think something important got overlooked.

Button is a reasonable player with ASB = 40%. BB is a typical 40/15 mediocre postflop.

What hands are you playing from SB when Button open-raises? Assume you posted 1/2 SB.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-19-2005, 03:05 AM
Spicymoose Spicymoose is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 146
Default Re: SB defense standards

I'll give you my range, but I have no idea how correct it is. It is really difficult for me to evaluate why one hand may be correct, while a similar hand is not.

Hands I 3-bet:

A8s+, A9o+, K9s+, KTo+, QJs, 77+.

Hands I call:

J9s, JTs, Q9s, QTs, 55, 66

Once again, just a guess, and I might play different from this in reality.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-19-2005, 04:27 AM
New001 New001 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: LA face with Oakland booty!
Posts: 376
Default Re: SB defense standards

This all depends on the player's postflop skills and his WTSD, but here's my standard. I'll usually 3-bet all pairs, most suited Aces, fewer but still a lot of offsuit Aces (A6+ or so?), and most hands with two broadway cards.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-19-2005, 05:49 AM
surfdoc surfdoc is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 140
Default Re: SB defense standards

[ QUOTE ]
Hands I call:

J9s, JTs, Q9s, QTs, 55, 66

[/ QUOTE ]

I think that calling with 55 and 66 is no bueno. These need to be included in the raise group.

I am really not sure how to play the others and I think my decision with these hands is almost always based on metagame considerations but that may be an incorrect approach.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-19-2005, 08:10 AM
kross kross is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 105
Default Re: SB defense standards

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Hands I call:

J9s, JTs, Q9s, QTs, 55, 66

[/ QUOTE ]

I think that calling with 55 and 66 is no bueno. These need to be included in the raise group.

I am really not sure how to play the others and I think my decision with these hands is almost always based on metagame considerations but that may be an incorrect approach.

[/ QUOTE ]

When deciding between 3-bet or call, you need to decide if you want the BB to come along or not. Does your hand have showdown value? Does it prefer to be heads-up or does it do well multiway?

As for 55 and 66, are you playing them for set value alone? Then call and let the BB in, to let you build a pot. If you want to have a chance of winning UI, then 3-bet.

Also, 3-betting is good to discourage people from taking shots at your blinds every time it's folded to them. You can't count on the BB to do this for you. [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

-- Kevin
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-19-2005, 08:47 AM
MAxx MAxx is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 7
Default Re: SB defense standards

Hands I 3-bet:

A7s+, A7o+, K9s+, KTo+, QJo, QJs, 55+. Sometimes on occasions i'll deviate based on things such as image and frequencey. I may for example 3bet JTo on occasion or 44. I may also decide to fold A7o occasion, etc.

I call nothing... unless Button is very agg and BB is very bad.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:17 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.