Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Tournament Poker > One-table Tournaments
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-05-2004, 02:45 PM
ThaSaltCracka ThaSaltCracka is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 983
Default somebody explain this to me

***** Hand History for Game 373587159 *****
200/400 TourneyTexasHTGameTable (NL) (Tournament 2161349) - Wed Feb 04 22:49:36 EST 2004
Table Card Room Table 3608 (Real Money) -- Seat 4 is the button
Total number of players : 4
Seat 1: SaltCracka (3210)
Seat 4: Ralieghg (2030)
Seat 5: rdtumpa (2450)
Seat 8: HomerLemon (310)
rdtumpa posts small blind (100)
HomerLemon posts big blind (200)
** Dealing down cards **
Dealt to SaltCracka [ 5s, Td ]
SaltCracka folds.
Ralieghg folds.
rdtumpa folds.
** Summary **
Main Pot: 300
SaltCracka balance 3210, didn't bet (folded)
Ralieghg balance 2030, didn't bet (folded)
rdtumpa balance 2350, lost 100 (folded)
HomerLemon balance 410, bet 200, collected 300, net +100


Okay this is the hand summary, my question is why wouldn't rdtumpa, call the BB or make him go all in???? He had a perfect opportunity to knock him out and it was only 210 more to force him allin. I would probably call with anything here. someone explain this to me.

anyways on the next hand Homer doubles up, then proceeds to get second in the tourney, I thought that was funny because he knocked rdtumpa out later on. I got first BTW [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-05-2004, 03:00 PM
Kurn, son of Mogh Kurn, son of Mogh is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Cranston, RI
Posts: 4,011
Default Re: somebody explain this to me

Okay this is the hand summary, my question is why wouldn't rdtumpa, call the BB or make him go all in????

he is clueless?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-05-2004, 03:14 PM
AleoMagus AleoMagus is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Victoria BC
Posts: 252
Default Re: somebody explain this to me

Yeah, this kind of this annoys me so much. I played one today where with three left, Player A(t5000ish) is in a 400 BB. I, with (t2000ish) am UTG and fold. SB with (t600ish) pushes all in for about 200 more than the BB (that's right, call 200 more to win 1200ish pot, and eliminate short stack). Player A folds.

If I didn't believe so strongly in the decency of all people I'd suspect collusion. Or maybe it's just that I believe even more strongly in the stupidity of some people.

Regards,
Brad S
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-05-2004, 03:15 PM
kerssens kerssens is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Bellevue, WA
Posts: 73
Default Re: somebody explain this to me

For the same reason that a 24o would call a raise 6x the BB
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-05-2004, 03:30 PM
ThaSaltCracka ThaSaltCracka is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 983
Default Re: somebody explain this to me

I would completely agree with you guys, I told Homer when it was heads up that I was glad he was still in because the other guy did not deserve to win anything playing that way.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-05-2004, 03:39 PM
Prickly Pete Prickly Pete is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: VA
Posts: 670
Default Further Question

This is an interesting point. Clearly, I agree with you here. But, at what point does playing any 2 not make sense. Let's say you are rdtumpa here and have 32o. What size stack does Homer need to make you fold instead of putting him allin?

And does it matter what your stack is (assuming you have Homer covered)?

I don't know have a concrete answer, but I bet Boze and the more mathematical types will.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-05-2004, 03:56 PM
Bozeman Bozeman is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: On the road again
Posts: 1,213
Default Re: Further Question

~2x-3x blind (total) depending on other factors.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 02-05-2004, 04:06 PM
ThaSaltCracka ThaSaltCracka is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 983
Default Re: Further Question

I would agree with bozeman.
I think if you have atleast 6x or higher of there stack I would call.
just me though
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 02-05-2004, 04:27 PM
TheGrifter TheGrifter is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 495
Default Re: somebody explain this to me

If you REALLY wanted him gone you could have raised 3xBB with your 10 5 and I'm sure the other guys whould have been more than happy to get out of the way. [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img]

I don't feel as strongly as some about taking a chance with a garbage hand to knock someone out, but in this case he was so shortstacked that doubling him up wouldn't have made much of a difference (620 instead of 410) so I would definitely put him all in and take a shot with any two.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 02-05-2004, 04:43 PM
eastbay eastbay is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 647
Default Re: Further Question

[ QUOTE ]
This is an interesting point. Clearly, I agree with you here. But, at what point does playing any 2 not make sense. Let's say you are rdtumpa here and have 32o. What size stack does Homer need to make you fold instead of putting him allin?

And does it matter what your stack is (assuming you have Homer covered)?

I don't know have a concrete answer, but I bet Boze and the more mathematical types will.

[/ QUOTE ]

I have done some simulations which seem to indicate that it is not smart to make -EV plays in this position, even if it could take your opponent out. The effect of you doubling him up more than outweighs the fact that he can't come back if you nail him.

This makes sense to me. If you're the big stack, you can afford to wait for +EV before taking him on.

On the other hand, it does appear to be always correct in that situation to make any and all +EV plays, even with slim margins.

eastbay
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:34 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.