MORE FISH: 6 max or 10 person tables?????

[Jay Dummeldinger]

Where do people think they are more fish?????


I have played both but don't know where they are more fish????

anyone have opinions

[drdre2001mm]

Site?
Limit?

I play 2-4 6max on The Gaming Club and I find it much easier than the 2-4 full.

[iluzion]

well that all depends on limit/site. but defining fish as a loose/passive-passive, then from my experience full rings have more fish. all the LAGs thrive in 6max, so theres less of them at full rings.

[AngryCola]

Okay, I wasn't going to answer this, because I thought it was such an easy question that others would get to it quickly.

Apparently not.

6-max games are almost always softer than full ring games.
This is definitely true for most online limits, particularly 1/2 and 5/10.

[Saint_D]

I don't know, where do you play? Likely there is one more fish there...

Now that the harsh put down is out there. Here comes the helpful advice.

10 max is probably easier to understand the 6 max. 6 max is probably more profitable for good players. Chances are you aren't a good player if you have to ask this question.

forget the fish, go for the bonuses.

-D

[Jay Dummeldinger]

I PLAY no limit 50 buy ins at PARTYPOKER, FULL RING

[AngryCola]

THAT'S GOOD to KNOW.

[Jay Dummeldinger]

are you being sarcastic

[sfwusc]

are you being sarcastic


I dont think he is!

Seriously, 6max is super weak. Short handed poker is very hard and varaince makes some bad players think that they are good. I do ok short handed, but some good shorter here would kill me long term. (short term is up to variance)

SFWUSC

[Homer]

10-handed games are far better. Yup, definitely 10-handed. Short-handed players are super tough to beat.