Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > General Poker Discussion > Poker Theory
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-05-2005, 09:47 PM
ianlippert ianlippert is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 88
Default How tight is too tight?

I am currently playing 1/2 Limit, and am about to start playing 2/4 when I hit $1200. I've been scouting the 2/4 and see that this is where things start to get tough. From what I've been reading ppl seem to play with a VPIP of 20 or more. Of the last 7500 hands I've averaged 14.5 and am afraid It will be too tight for the higher levels. On the other hand I have also been averaging 5BB/hr and have come to play the tight game really well.

I know poker isnt a game of simplistic stats, but of outplaying your opponents. But at what point does a tight player get eaten by the blinds? What is the bare theoretical set of hands that could beat the blinds/rake?

Also to those winning players with 20+ VPIP what exactly are you playing? It seems like you would have to be playing suited connectors, suited aces, etc from all positions to get a vpip over 20. I have always found these to be big losers in limit.

What should I expect at the higher limits?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-05-2005, 11:10 PM
RedManPlus RedManPlus is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Canada
Posts: 175
Default Re: How tight is too tight?

First...
Get Small Stakes Hold'em by Sklansky et al.
Published January 2005...
Which is aimed at $2/$4 and $3/$6...
And recommends playing more hands than you do.

Second...
"How tight is too tight?" is an excellent question.

I've been data mining Party $2/$4 for a month...
As an interesting mathematical exercise...
So I have 35,000 hands of very recent play.

Most of the winning players are 15% to 22% VP$IP...
And Pre-Flop Raise > 9%.

There are virtually no consistent winners below 15% VP$IP...
So at $2/$4 there is "too tight"... and it's below 15%.

But there is no magic number.

You can do well anywhere in the 16-22% range...
Depending on your style.

The most important thing it seems...
Is how well you play post flop.

My $0.02

rm+

[img]/images/graemlins/cool.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/cool.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/cool.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-06-2005, 10:40 AM
stlip stlip is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 87
Default Re: How tight is too tight?

I think the 2+2 consensus would be that 20-22 percent is optimal for 1/2 and that moving up to 2/4 this drops to more like 17-18. However, the drop in VPIP for most players will come as a natural outgrowth of the more aggressive play at the higher level. More pots are raised early in the betting, more end up being contested two- and three-way rather than four- and five-way so a lot of hands you could play in LP or in the blinds at 1/2 become folds.

Your question about what is too tight is interesting. But I don't think it is the blinds that are the problem. I think at least some of the fish at 1/2 -- and maybe even a handful at .5/1 -- do recognize extremely tight play and save their wildest aggression for pots with the other loose players and players like me (VPIP 22-24) who play in enough hands to seem to blend into their world.

That's just my unsystematic observation. Whether that's true or not at micro limits, there's little question that at 2/4 enough players would be noticing overly tight play and the result would consistently mean a bet or two less in too many pots when you make your best hands.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-06-2005, 02:22 PM
xPuns1her xPuns1her is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 181
Default Re: How tight is too tight?

I heard Sklansky is an incredible poker mind but he sucks at actually playing... I found that quite amusing... reminds me of a friend.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-06-2005, 03:11 PM
Little Fishy Little Fishy is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: MA, and NY for school
Posts: 8
Default Re: How tight is too tight?

[ QUOTE ]
But at what point does a tight player get eaten by the blinds? What is the bare theoretical set of hands that could beat the blinds/rake?

[/ QUOTE ]

the rake is much worse at 1/2 than it is at 2/4 so looking at it this way you should play tighter at 2/4, i think the difference is that the players at higher limits are going to start noticing your tightness more and not paying you off. also 2/4 is a little bit tighter than 1/2 so playing a litte looser can take down more pots.

a lot of the hands you play should be skill dependent.. for instance a really good player can make a lot of hands that are -EV from early position for me +EV out of the same position. i think that the more skill you gain post flop the greater number of hands you can afford to play preflop.

I also think that loosening up greatens your variance... I'd like to get a second opinion on this one though.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-06-2005, 04:01 PM
Wally Weeks Wally Weeks is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Seattle, WA, USA
Posts: 139
Default Re: How tight is too tight?

[ QUOTE ]
I heard Sklansky is an incredible poker mind but he sucks at actually playing... I found that quite amusing... reminds me of a friend.

[/ QUOTE ]

hmm...troll.

Thank you for your nonrelevent BS addition to the thread.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 05-06-2005, 04:21 PM
-Skeme- -Skeme- is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: S. Korea ($100 NL)
Posts: 2,694
Default Re: How tight is too tight?

2/4 is still very loose.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 05-06-2005, 06:11 PM
ianlippert ianlippert is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 88
Default Re: How tight is too tight?

[ QUOTE ]


the rake is much worse at 1/2 than it is at 2/4 so looking at it this way you should play tighter at 2/4, i think the difference is that the players at higher limits are going to start noticing your tightness more and not paying you off. also 2/4 is a little bit tighter than 1/2 so playing a litte looser can take down more pots.



[/ QUOTE ]

I'm not too sure about that. My agression factor so far at the 1/2 tables is over 5. I've always felt like ppl equate your preflop play with how tight/agressive you are. They automatically assume that because you play very few hands you are a weak player. But I'm not, I am very aggresive post flop and I find ppl calling me to the river when I do have a hand. I like my style, and I think I will stick with it until things start going bad.

As for SSH, I've read it. I have no problem with loose games. I guess I am just wondering what types of playes you are going to make at the higher levels. Are you going to call a raise with Axs just because you can 'outplay' your opponent? I find limit is mostly about showing down the best hand.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 05-06-2005, 06:51 PM
Jason B Jason B is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 1
Default Re: How tight is too tight?

[ QUOTE ]
2/4 is still very loose.

[/ QUOTE ]

I have been playing up to 10/20 on party the last 4 weeks and notice these tables can be as loose as the 2/4 tables. Full of people trying to give their money away.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 05-07-2005, 07:19 AM
stlip stlip is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 87
Default Re: How tight is too tight?

I think most people would say that an ag factor of 5 is way too high. It sounds like you avoid quite a few marginal situations that are long-term +EV and possibly that your bets and raises are met with too many folds and simple call downs.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:39 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.