Is there a typo in HOH II

[Inuyasha17]

i know this is being alittle picky but i think the calculation
of M is incorrect on page 142 for player two.

[ImDaMan]

Good catch - you are correct. Without a calculator, it looks like it should be closer to 2.5, not 25.

[jgunnip]

There are a ton of typos in HOH2.

[Quad_Damage]

[ QUOTE ]
i know this is being alittle picky but i think the calculation
of M is incorrect on page 142 for player two.

[/ QUOTE ]

Well, consider the publisher and the many topics on this board about typos.

[Quad_Damage]

[ QUOTE ]
There are a ton of typos in HOH2.

[/ QUOTE ]

Hi jgunnip:
Feel free to read books not published by 2+2

Best Wishes,
Mason


You know it's coming.

[larrondo]

Here's one that slowed me down. In the first problem hand, page 65, it says, "This approach is more effective against weak players than strong players. At a table of strong players, a call is more likely to be interpritated as some sort of trap play." Actually, he means the play works better against strong players than it does against weak players, since you are just limping on the flop. It's the exact opposite meaning, unless there is something I am truely missing here.

[Jeebus]

I think he means if you limp in preflop the good players are going to see this as either A)a weak/decent hand or B)a chance to trap. Since I don't remember the situation and am at work I don't remember which. However a weak player sees you limp as you limping and does not think twice about it.

[larrondo]

Yes, exactly. This play wouldn't work on weak players.