Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Mid- and High-Stakes Hold'em
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 10-27-2005, 06:40 PM
PokerBob PokerBob is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: St. Paul
Posts: 238
Default Re: clangs

[ QUOTE ]
I'm not sure if I understand; why not ditch it preflop?

[/ QUOTE ]
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 10-27-2005, 06:48 PM
Justin A Justin A is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: I travel the world and the seven seas
Posts: 494
Default Re: clangs

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I'm not sure if I understand; why not ditch it preflop?

[/ QUOTE ]

[/ QUOTE ]

Are you serious?
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 10-27-2005, 06:53 PM
nfscreech nfscreech is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 19
Default Re: clangs

Raising the turn is not really believable. We checked the flop and now the 4 comes off. That couldn't have helped our hand. Villian may call and lead a blank river, thinking we have overcards/a busted bdflush.

Also, villian may have a made hand. Raising the turn commits us to 2 bets. If villian calls the turn raise, we have to guess whether or not he was on a draw. We may fire another bet at the river, only to find out he had a made hand. However, if we call the turn bet, and villian leads the river, we can fold, and our play costs 1 bet. If he checks, we can now steal this pot at a greater success rate than the turn raise. This is especially true if a high card comes off on the river.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 10-27-2005, 06:55 PM
durrrr durrrr is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 81
Default Re: clangs

[ QUOTE ]
go deeper into the hand.
1. desribe your opponnent
2. describe his state of mind
3. describe some previous hands you played with him
4. what is your current image in the game
5. are you winning or losing at this point
6. is your opponennt winning or losing
7. what were his mannerisms on the turn when he bet; something must have told you he didn't have it and to call there.
8. is he type to bet with bad hands and check with good hands
9. Is he the type that never checkraises and this is the reason why you bet?

[/ QUOTE ]

This post was awful. And i like tommy's posts. Cmon at least give some reasoning or something. I can talk about big Ace high calls i made (in NL), but noone cares unless there is a specific (and good) reason for the play. I really would like these 9 questions to be answered.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 10-27-2005, 07:04 PM
BobboFitos BobboFitos is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: It\'s hot in here
Posts: 551
Default Re: clangs

[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 10-27-2005, 07:50 PM
jason_t jason_t is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Another downswing?
Posts: 2,274
Default Re: clangs

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I'm not sure if I understand; why not ditch it preflop?

[/ QUOTE ]

[/ QUOTE ]

No way. Not in a 5-handed game with an UTG limper and a likely tight/solid image. This hand can be played profitably here.
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 10-27-2005, 07:55 PM
dankhank dankhank is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: boston
Posts: 87
Default Re: clangs

it's as if some people responding to tommy's posts have spent zero time sitting at a poker table and studying how a game can flow, and all their time in some realm where poker rules and strategies exist, but the game is never actually played against thinking opponents.

it's a lot harder for a bluff to work when it sticks out like a sore thumb.
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 10-27-2005, 08:47 PM
mike l. mike l. is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: oceanside, california
Posts: 2,212
Default Re: clangs

im with you on this one tommy.

couple weeks ago. i have 64o in the bb mirage 20-40 short handed new game. sb doesnt chop. folded to him he raises, i call. the flop is KQ3, he bets, i call. the turn is a Q. he checks, i bet, he folds.
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 10-27-2005, 10:10 PM
andyfox andyfox is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 4,677
Default Re: clangs

I hope Tommy's critics read his post carefully. Each paragraph.
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 10-27-2005, 11:29 PM
Chris Daddy Cool Chris Daddy Cool is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 401
Default Re: clangs

[ QUOTE ]
I hope Tommy's critics read his post carefully. Each paragraph.

[/ QUOTE ]

tommy has critics?



anyways, i think calling the turn is much better than raising it.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:25 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.