|
|
#11
12-03-2005, 03:47 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Sklansky\'s Small Stakes Holdem
[ QUOTE ]
thanks good advice guys. I think the way sklansky has written it in his book is wrong. [/ QUOTE ] You actually read the replies and then came to the above conclusion? WOW! Jimbo 
|
|
#12
12-04-2005, 08:30 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Sklansky\'s Small Stakes Holdem
No the advice is sound but the way he wrote it on page 81, i think is a typo. Take a look at how it says to play raise in big blind.
|
|
#14
12-04-2005, 03:44 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Sklansky\'s Small Stakes Holdem
[ QUOTE ]
No the advice is sound but the way he wrote it on page 81, i think is a typo. Take a look at how it says to play raise in big blind. [/ QUOTE ] "Same hands that you would play from late position <u>for one bet</u>, except remove the weak offsuit hands..." It doesn't say the same hands you'd play in late position against a raise, except remove the weak offsuit hands. It says the same hands you'd play in late position for one bet, meaning the hands you'd limp with. There is no typo. And it's Ed Miller's book.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
