#1
|
|||
|
|||
Super Royal Flush REVERSE SUCKOUT hand
It's nice to smack the fish in the face sometimes..
***** Hand History for Game 1906765933 ***** NL Hold'em $10 Buy-in + $1 Entry Fee Trny:11368672 Level:4 Blinds(50/100) - Sunday, April 17, 00:45:22 EDT 2005 Table Table 17602 (Real Money) Seat 2 is the button Total number of players : 5 Seat 2: BIG_DH11 ( $1403 ) Seat 3: dr_butch ( $1985 ) Seat 4: faquewdikhed ( $1195 ) Seat 5: wildbill815 ( $1550 ) Seat 7: BobbyBeamen ( $1867 ) Trny:11368672 Level:4 Blinds(50/100) ** Dealing down cards ** Dealt to faquewdikhed [ Ah Qh ] wildbill815 folds. BobbyBeamen raises [200]. BIG_DH11 folds. dr_butch folds. faquewdikhed calls [100]. ** Dealing Flop ** [ Jh, Ad, Kh ] faquewdikhed checks. BobbyBeamen bets [200]. >You have options at Table 39800 Table!. faquewdikhed is all-In [995] BobbyBeamen calls [795]. ** Dealing Turn ** [ Ts ] ** Dealing River ** [ Th ] BobbyBeamen shows [ Td, Kd ] a full house, Tens full of kings. faquewdikhed shows [ Ah, Qh ] Royal Flush. faquewdikhed wins 2440 chips from the main pot with Royal Flush. ouch |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Super Royal Flush REVERSE SUCKOUT hand
Nice, fun stuff [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Super Royal Flush REVERSE SUCKOUT hand
Hmmm, the queation is who is the fish?? [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img]
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Super Royal Flush REVERSE SUCKOUT hand
[ QUOTE ]
Hmmm, the queation is who is the fish?? [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img] [/ QUOTE ] Well... in between someone who goes all-in with top pair and inside straight flush draw, and someone else who calls all-in with middle pair and inside straight draw? |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Super Royal Flush REVERSE SUCKOUT hand
Maybe I'll learn something here...
Villain was borderline maniac and I honestly thought I had the best hand when I went all in. He was calling down pots let and right. I wanted to make it look like a steal attempt. If he had me beat, I had nut straight and flush outs. Still terrible? |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Super Royal Flush REVERSE SUCKOUT hand
I think you played it fine. This not a suckout, reverse or otherwise, though. You were ahead on every street.
The only debateble street, IMO is preflop, where a reraise all-in should be considered. Paul |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Super Royal Flush REVERSE SUCKOUT hand
Here are a few of the hands which generated my reads; I'm not saying my play was the correct thing to do, but the feel of the hand made it seem like he was weak. This was the last table of a 4-table set, so my undivided attention was focused on this table.
#Game No : 1906744567 ***** Hand History for Game 1906744567 ***** NL Hold'em $10 Buy-in + $1 Entry Fee Trny:11368672 Level:3 Blinds(25/50) - Sunday, April 17, 00:40:51 EDT 2005 Table Table 17602 (Real Money) Seat 4 is the button Total number of players : 6 Seat 1: NAILATI316 ( $695 ) Seat 2: BIG_DH11 ( $858 ) Seat 3: dr_butch ( $1835 ) Seat 4: faquewdikhed ( $1295 ) Seat 5: wildbill815 ( $1225 ) Seat 7: BobbyBeamen ( $2092 ) Trny:11368672 Level:3 Blinds(25/50) ** Dealing down cards ** Dealt to faquewdikhed [ Ac Tc ] NAILATI316 folds. BIG_DH11 folds. dr_butch folds. faquewdikhed calls [50]. wildbill815 folds. BobbyBeamen raises [150]. >You have options at Table 11589 Table!. faquewdikhed folds. BobbyBeamen does not show cards. BobbyBeamen wins 275 chips Game #1906746870 starts. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Super Royal Flush REVERSE SUCKOUT hand
[ QUOTE ]
The only debateble street, IMO is preflop, where a reraise all-in should be considered. Paul [/ QUOTE ] Makes for an easy reraise all in preflop especially considering villain was a loose maniac. Your going to be lightyears ahead of what he is raising, and you take all the headaches out of playing AQ postflop out of position, against a loose maniac. You are going to have no idea where you are at in the hand whenever you dont flop TPTK. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Super Royal Flush REVERSE SUCKOUT hand
I prefer to call that the, re-suckout.
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Super Royal Flush REVERSE SUCKOUT hand
What about after I already was in the hand?
Bad play to go all in? |
|
|