Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Other Topics > Sporting Events
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-17-2005, 11:36 PM
MightyMouse MightyMouse is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 48
Default 2005 MLB win shares

two questions:
1) does anyone have a link?

2) how valuable is this stat?

ty
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-17-2005, 11:38 PM
Jack of Arcades Jack of Arcades is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: not the gay jack
Posts: 2,275
Default Re: 2005 MLB win shares

[ QUOTE ]
two questions:
1) does anyone have a link?

2) how valuable is this stat?

ty

[/ QUOTE ]

1) You can find them Here throughout the season

2) MEH. offensive winshares is pretty useful, it factors in teh CLUTCH~! defensive winshares blows. bill james threw together a bunch of crap just to make it work without being able to explain it.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-17-2005, 11:49 PM
MightyMouse MightyMouse is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 48
Default Re: 2005 MLB win shares

yea these really disturbed me. i have a hard time believe that david eckstein is more valuable than travis hafner.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-18-2005, 12:20 AM
andyfox andyfox is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 4,677
Default Re: 2005 MLB win shares

I'm wondering how Eckstein got 20.6 offensive win shares.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-18-2005, 09:16 AM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: 2005 MLB win shares

well hafner got a 0 for defense since he's a dh that basically is the reason. i guess the only conclusion might be a good hitter who can also play short is pretty valuable. interesting giles was so high. may tell you how tough petco park is.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-18-2005, 09:19 AM
DougOzzzz DougOzzzz is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 132
Default Re: 2005 MLB win shares

[ QUOTE ]
i guess the only conclusion might be a good hitter who can also play short is pretty valuable.

[/ QUOTE ]

I think Andy's point was that Eckstein is not a good hitter.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10-18-2005, 09:21 AM
Jack of Arcades Jack of Arcades is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: not the gay jack
Posts: 2,275
Default Re: 2005 MLB win shares

[ QUOTE ]
well hafner got a 0 for defense since he's a dh that basically is the reason. i guess the only conclusion might be a good hitter who can also play short is pretty valuable. interesting giles was so high. may tell you how tough petco park is.

[/ QUOTE ]

Well, ranking third in OBP in the NL's a pretty valuable thing. But yeah, according to BB-Ref, Petco surpressed hitting by 10%.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 10-18-2005, 09:30 AM
Paluka Paluka is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: New York
Posts: 373
Default Re: 2005 MLB win shares

[ QUOTE ]
I'm wondering how Eckstein got 20.6 offensive win shares.

[/ QUOTE ]

Is it position adjusted? If so, a .363 OBP over 158 games at shortstop is worth a ton.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 10-18-2005, 09:39 AM
DougOzzzz DougOzzzz is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 132
Default Re: 2005 MLB win shares

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I'm wondering how Eckstein got 20.6 offensive win shares.

[/ QUOTE ]

Is it position adjusted? If so, a .363 OBP over 158 games at shortstop is worth a ton.

[/ QUOTE ]

Offensive win shares aren't position adjusted. The position adjustment is built in to the defensive win shares.

Still, Eckstein's year at the plate was far and away the best of his career and 20.6 win shares does not seem far off to me.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 10-18-2005, 09:42 AM
DougOzzzz DougOzzzz is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 132
Default Re: 2005 MLB win shares

[ QUOTE ]
defensive winshares blows. bill james threw together a bunch of crap just to make it work without being able to explain it.

[/ QUOTE ]

To the best of my understanding, it's pretty damn hard to get an accurate defensive rating without batted ball locations. Since James created win shares with the goal of evaluating all of the players in baseball history - I think he did a decent job.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:26 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.