Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Other Topics > Politics
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 08-18-2005, 11:26 PM
natedogg natedogg is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 0
Default Re: An Open Challenge

[ QUOTE ]
To anyone who supports the Iraq War,

[/ QUOTE ]

Define "supports the Iraq War".

natedogg
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 08-18-2005, 11:45 PM
BCPVP BCPVP is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Whitewater, WI
Posts: 830
Default Re: An Open Challenge

Here's a question for you, DVault. Has the U.S. military turned down anyone who was willing and able to serve on the basis of not needing volunteers? I can't think of a time. So your premise that the military is suddenly starving for volunteers is misleading because the military is always starving for more volunteers.

Now could you hop on down from your high horse and be done with the name-calling?
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 08-19-2005, 07:44 AM
DVaut1 DVaut1 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 27
Default Re: An Open Challenge

[ QUOTE ]
Here's a question for you, DVault. Has the U.S. military turned down anyone who was willing and able to serve on the basis of not needing volunteers? I can't think of a time. So your premise that the military is suddenly starving for volunteers is misleading because the military is always starving for more volunteers.

[/ QUOTE ]

If that's true, and let's just assume it is, because I have no knowledge to the contrary - then the only implication is that you ought to be willing to go fight in any war that you also support; which is what I've been saying all along.

Also, if this is true, then read over the post q/q started about the army missing it's recruiting goals and see how many posters claimed they "weren't needed".

Sounds like we agree, they are needed.

[ QUOTE ]
Now could you hop on down from your high horse and be done with the name-calling?

[/ QUOTE ]

No. It may be name-calling, but it's not name-calling without a purpose. War supporters should be reconsidering their support for the war, in light of the fact they're hypocrites.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 08-19-2005, 08:01 AM
Darryl_P Darryl_P is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 158
Default Re: An Open Challenge

Just an impartial observer here thinking out loud...

Is it not enough to pay taxes to avoid hypocrisy? By paying taxes you are paying their wages, expenses, supplies, etc. ie. helping to make it all happen. If that doesn't count as support then why not take it away and see if it makes a difference?
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 08-19-2005, 08:03 AM
warlockjd warlockjd is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Posts: 165
Default Re: An Open Challenge

[ QUOTE ]
Here's a question for you, DVault. Has the U.S. military turned down anyone who was willing and able to serve on the basis of not needing volunteers? I can't think of a time. So your premise that the military is suddenly starving for volunteers is misleading because the military is always starving for more volunteers.

Now could you hop on down from your high horse and be done with the name-calling?

[/ QUOTE ]

Actually, this changes nothing.

The OP was in response to a few war supporters who claimed the armed forces did not need their support.

Your point that the armed forces 'always' need more support/manpower further helps the OP refute these claims.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 08-19-2005, 04:30 PM
jaxmike jaxmike is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 636
Default Re: An Open Challenge

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Not at all. If you can actually support this, please do so.

[/ QUOTE ]

I supported my claim here.

I had something like 40 posts in that thread and don't have much more to add.

[/ QUOTE ]

You did no such thing. You did not prove that supporting the war and not enlisting is being hypocritical. That's like saying that if a woman supports abortion, but doesn't have one then she is being a hypocrit. And damnit that's as ignorant of a leap in logic as the one you are making. I don't expect you to understand.
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 08-19-2005, 04:36 PM
jaxmike jaxmike is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 636
Default Re: An Open Challenge

[ QUOTE ]

No. It may be name-calling, but it's not name-calling without a purpose. War supporters should be reconsidering their support for the war, in light of the fact they're hypocrites.

[/ QUOTE ]

They are not hypocrites. Again, I do not expect you to be able to understand why.
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 08-19-2005, 04:39 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: No caveat in your challenge about age is there?(n/m)

[ QUOTE ]
Changing your rules now are ya? Just because people found a loophole, your word is not good.

[/ QUOTE ]

Hey ConservoMax, go watch C-Span and get edujamacated. Hope you don't fail out of your econ major the first day.
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 08-19-2005, 04:41 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: An Open Challenge

[ QUOTE ]
Just an impartial observer here thinking out loud...

Is it not enough to pay taxes to avoid hypocrisy? By paying taxes you are paying their wages, expenses, supplies, etc. ie. helping to make it all happen. If that doesn't count as support then why not take it away and see if it makes a difference?

[/ QUOTE ]

Pull that ribbon off your gigantic SUV in the exurbs.

Now, that's a really bad argument, because everyone is required to pay taxes by law. You are not legally required to serve in the United States military.
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 08-19-2005, 05:01 PM
DVaut1 DVaut1 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 27
Default Re: An Open Challenge

[ QUOTE ]
That's like saying that if a woman supports abortion, but doesn't have one then she is being a hypocrit.

[/ QUOTE ]

Well, if someone supports legalized abortions, yet claims to be morally opposed to abortions - then yes, of course, they're hypocrites too. Please review the posts in the thread that I linked, which dealt with Ted Kennedy, abortion, and being a hypocrite.

[ QUOTE ]
I don't expect you to understand.

[/ QUOTE ]

If by this you mean that you won't be trying to argue with me, I'll guess I'll just be left to wonder what deep, profound, and unfathomable arguments you would have made, had I only the capacity to understand.

O cruel Lord, why must you consistently send my intellectual superiors to torture me so? With their intentional misspellings of 'hypocrit' and purposefully poorly-written arguments, how I only wish You would give me the power to comprehend them...
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:52 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.