Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > 2+2 Communities > Other Other Topics
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

View Poll Results: 5 vs 12
Neo 83 69.75%
Papa Smurf 36 30.25%
Voters: 119. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-05-2005, 07:19 PM
tbach24 tbach24 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Trying to overcome the bad luck
Posts: 2,351
Default Beatles vs. Led Zeppelin

I really love the Beatles, but haven't been exposed to LZ enough. So temporarily I will go with the Beatles
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-05-2005, 07:24 PM
Justin A Justin A is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: I travel the world and the seven seas
Posts: 494
Default Re: Beatles vs. Led Zeppelin

It's a tough one, since they're my two favorite bands, but I had to go with Zeppelin for their superior musical ability.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-05-2005, 07:28 PM
JoshuaD JoshuaD is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: NJ, USA
Posts: 341
Default Re: Beatles vs. Led Zeppelin

Zepplin's a glorified hair band. Beatles are classic. Easy choice.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-05-2005, 07:31 PM
Jonny Jonny is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 10
Default Re: Beatles vs. Led Zeppelin

I like em both, but I had to go with zeppelin.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-05-2005, 07:40 PM
anisotropy anisotropy is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Vineland, NJ
Posts: 38
Default Re: Beatles vs. Led Zeppelin

[ QUOTE ]
It's a tough one, since they're my two favorite bands, but I had to go with Zeppelin for their superior musical ability.

[/ QUOTE ]

Other than Bonzo clearly being better on the drums than Ringo, I don't see how any Zeppelin member is better than any Beatle member in musical ability.

George > Jimmy (guitar)
Paul > John Paul (bass)
John > Robert (vocals)

Don't even get started on songwriting ability. This one should be a slam dunk for the Beatles.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-05-2005, 07:42 PM
kerssens kerssens is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Bellevue, WA
Posts: 73
Default Re: Beatles vs. Led Zeppelin

Can't remember where I heard this but someone told a story about when the Beatles met Muhammad Ali. They talked for awhile and after they left Ali turned to the interviewer (Cosell??) and asked.."who were those fags?"
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 05-05-2005, 07:46 PM
istewart istewart is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Baseball Preview Issue
Posts: 2,523
Default Re: Beatles vs. Led Zeppelin

My two favorite bands. The Beatles in a walk, however.

But to the guy above, saying Harrison is a better guitarist than Page is ludicrous.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 05-05-2005, 07:52 PM
Blarg Blarg is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,519
Default Re: Beatles vs. Led Zeppelin

Sounds a little apocryphal.

As to the songwriting, I'd have to agree that Zeppelin isn't anywhere near as good as the Beatles. Page's guitar is probably one of the more influential things in modern music, though.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 05-05-2005, 08:07 PM
jesusarenque jesusarenque is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 470
Default Re: Beatles vs. Led Zeppelin

The Rolling Stones>The Beatles>Zep

Easy
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 05-05-2005, 08:14 PM
Justin A Justin A is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: I travel the world and the seven seas
Posts: 494
Default Re: Beatles vs. Led Zeppelin

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
It's a tough one, since they're my two favorite bands, but I had to go with Zeppelin for their superior musical ability.

[/ QUOTE ]

Other than Bonzo clearly being better on the drums than Ringo, I don't see how any Zeppelin member is better than any Beatle member in musical ability.

George > Jimmy (guitar)
Paul > John Paul (bass)
John > Robert (vocals)

Don't even get started on songwriting ability. This one should be a slam dunk for the Beatles.

[/ QUOTE ]

You're kidding right? George was a run of the mill guitarist, and Jimmy was one of the greatest. John Paul Jones was a much better bassist and pianist than McCartney(sp?). Robert Plant was a more talented vocalist by far. You might actually have somewhat of an argument if you include the small period where Eric Clapton played with the Beatles.

The Beatles do have the edge in songwriting.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:05 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.