folded TPTK there...

I think its very close. FWIW I would probably play like villain with KQ-K10. When you say he is a TAG I am not certain that he will call with any hand that beat you except 22,55,A2s and maybe K5s. And you beat KQ-K10 which are more combinations so I would probably call down in hindsight.

[irishpint]

you're getting like 5:1 to make the turn and river calls- consider it done.

[IPSC]

At first glance I think you should call down, but now I'm not so sure. I'm having trouble putting him on a hand that would call two cold on the flop and then raise the turn when the K[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] falls.

A good TAG wouldn't open limp and would probably 3-bet the flop with two other players already having put bets in. I think this guy is probably more straightforward than his stats suggest, so I think folding is OK.

[McGahee]

There are certain spots where you should be less willing to call down a Tag, and this is not one of them.
This would be an instamuck against a fish, because a flop coldcall + turn C/R = trips every time.
If this guy really is a Tag though (which I kinda doubt) he could just be trying to push you off QQ-66, so I would call down.
Hero's fold isn't really consistent with his read here IMO.

[xenthebrain]

[ QUOTE ]
There are certain spots where you should be less willing to call down a Tag, and this is not one of them.
This would be an instamuck against a fish, because a flop coldcall + turn C/R = trips every time.
If this guy really is a Tag though (which I kinda doubt) he could just be trying to push you off QQ-66, so I would call down.
Hero's fold isn't really consistent with his read here IMO.

[/ QUOTE ]

Yeah, that is maybe the problem.
You play with bad players all the time and when you see stuff like that you know you are beaten in general.
But here is not one of these typical situations, and thats why I couldn't stop thinking I made a mistake here.